Hi,

Thanks for all of your supplement.

Before releasing, I checked the boudles in the distribution version and fixed 
the LICENSE-binary in [1].

[1] https://github.com/apache/incubator-iotdb/pull/1518

Thanks,
--
Jialin Qiao
School of Software, Tsinghua University

乔嘉林
清华大学 软件学院

> -----原始邮件-----
> 发件人: "Haonan Hou" <hhao...@outlook.com>
> 发送时间: 2020-07-17 16:24:02 (星期五)
> 收件人: "dev@iotdb.apache.org" <dev@iotdb.apache.org>
> 抄送: 
> 主题: Re: [Discuss] Release of 0.10.1
> 
> +1.
> 
> Seems like many critical bugs has been fixed. I think it’s necessary to 
> release 0.10.1 now. 
> 
> Best,
> Haonan
> 
> 
> > On Jul 17, 2020, at 4:16 PM, Julian Feinauer <j.feina...@pragmaticminds.de> 
> > wrote:
> > 
> > Release early and often, they say. So you got my +1 : )
> > 
> > Julian
> > 
> > Am 17.07.20, 10:13 schrieb "田原" <tian...@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn>:
> > 
> >    Hi Jialin,
> > 
> >    +1.
> > 
> >    And I make another two improvements that should be included in 0.10.1
> > 
> >    * [IOTDB-802] Improve Group By 
> >    * Change the default fetch size in 
> > session(https://github.com/apache/incubator-iotdb/pull/1506)
> > 
> >    Best,
> >    ---------------
> >    Yuan Tian
> > 
> > 
> >> -----原始邮件-----
> >> 发件人: "Jialin Qiao" <qj...@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn>
> >> 发送时间: 2020-07-16 18:02:10 (星期四)
> >> 收件人: dev-iotdb <dev@iotdb.apache.org>
> >> 抄送: 
> >> 主题: [Discuss] Release of 0.10.1
> >> 
> >> Hi,
> >> 
> >> 
> >> Bugs always appear, but we will kill them one by one.
> >> 
> >> 
> >> I list the fixed bug since 0.10.0, it's time to consider releasing 0.10.1
> >> 
> >> 
> >> * [IOTDB-797] InsertTablet deserialization from WAL error
> >> * [IOTDB-788] Can not upgrade all storage groups
> >> * [IOTDB-792] deadlock when insert while show latest timeseries
> >> * [IOTDB-794] Rename file or delete file Error in start check in Windows
> >> * [IOTDB-795] BufferUnderflowException in Hive-connector 
> >> * [IOTDB-766] Do not release unclosed file reader, a small memory leak
> >> * [IOTDB-796] Concurrent Query throughput is low
> >> * Query result is not correct when some unsequence data exists
> >> 
> >> 
> >> Have I missed any? And, is there anyone wants to be the RM of 0.10.1 :)
> >> 
> >> Thanks,
> >> --
> >> Jialin Qiao
> >> School of Software, Tsinghua University
> >> 
> >> 乔嘉林
> >> 清华大学 软件学院
> > 
> 

Reply via email to