[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-358?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17046089#comment-17046089 ]
Jialin Qiao commented on IOTDB-358: ----------------------------------- The start time point is the same as the start time of the quired interval. I think the new syntax is more friendly to users. > Questions about the `group by` down-samplying clause > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Key: IOTDB-358 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-358 > Project: Apache IoTDB > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.9.0 > Reporter: xiangdong Huang > Priority: Major > Labels: discussion > > When reading issue #331, I read the `group by` document again and find some > confusing contents: > V0.9: > [http://iotdb.apache.org/#/Documents/0.9.0/chap5/sec2] > # (minor), typo, Fig 5.2 rather than Fig 3.2 > # The first parameter of the GROUP BY statement above is the time interval > for dividing the time axis. Taking this parameter (1d) as time interval and > the default origin as the dividing origin, the time axis is divided into > several continuous intervals, which are [0,1d], [1d, 2d], [2d, 3d], etc. > My question is, is the data point at 1d calculated twice? > > V0.10: > [http://iotdb.apache.org/#/Documents/progress/chap5/sec2] > the syntax is quite different with v0.9.0. I originally thought it was an > improvement comparing with 0.9, but when I read the document, I find it loses > the ability to define the start point of the timestamp for splitting the time > window. > Can someone tell me why to design like this? > > -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005)