+1, generally the javadoc is not incorrect but can be written more clearly.
Lei Rui
On 9/19/2019 14:36，Xiangdong Huang wrote：
Hi,
Ok then just take care when using it.
No, I think we need to fix the javadoc.
Best,
---
Xiangdong Huang
School of Software, Tsinghua
Hi,
> Ok then just take care when using it.
No, I think we need to fix the javadoc.
Best,
---
Xiangdong Huang
School of Software, Tsinghua University
黄向东
清华大学 软件学院
Lei Rui 于2019年9月19日周四 下午2:31写道：
> Hi,
>
>
> > I do not know why the mail does not show the des
Hi,
> I do not know why the mail does not show the description...
Sorry it is because I didn't know how to add the detail description when
opening an issue on JIRA. Thankfully, I now know how to do that.
Below is the raw description:
```
1) Structure
ChunkMetaData.offsetOfChunkHeader refers t
Hi,
I do not know why the mail does not show the description...
> As suggested by Jialin Qiao, an ideal case may be that
ChunkMetaData.offsetOfChunkHeader refers to the position AFTER Marker_1 too.
+1.
> A solution is changing the name of the parameter from `markerRead` to
`isMarkerExist`
The
Lei Rui created IOTDB-229:
-
Summary: Inconsistent usage of Marker in TsFile
Key: IOTDB-229
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-229
Project: Apache IoTDB
Issue Type: Improvement
