Hi,
> So I wouldn't explicitly mention any of these branding issues.
Yep agree, it more issues of people misusing the Apache projects name.
Thanks,
Justin
Hi all,
I think we'll probably run into similar problems whenever IoT data is to be
stored in a DB.
I think IoTDB is safe from the side that no other organization will be able to
deny us the usage of the name.
But I doubt the ASF will be able to enforce the name, if someone uses it.
Especially i
Hi,
> How about the following:
>
> Required Name Search is done.
> On Google Search:
> 1. There is a dataset called "iotdb" (Internet of Things Database, from
> http://www.green-ic.org/). The last update date is 2017-08-16.
> 2. There was a project called IoTDB, whose website is iotdb.org. Bu
Update:
> There was a project called IoTDB, whose website is iotdb.org.
I am not sure whether it is correct, because I can hardly find documents
(or download urls of the software) about it...
Best,
---
Xiangdong Huang
School of Software, Tsinghua University
黄向东
Hi,
How about the following:
Required Name Search is done.
On Google Search:
1. There is a dataset called "iotdb" (Internet of Things Database, from
http://www.green-ic.org/). The last update date is 2017-08-16.
2. There was a project called IoTDB, whose website is iotdb.org. But the
webs
Hi,
> Looks fine up to now.
I know a name search has been done, A quick google search shows a number of
minor issues, might be a couple you want to deal with.
Thanks,
Justin
Hi,
The new question in the report is:
Is the PPMC managing the podling's brand / trademarks? Are 3rd parties
respecting and correctly using the podlings name and brand? If not what
actions has the PPMC taken to correct this? Has the VP, Brand approved the
project name?
Looks fine up to now.
If
Hi,
> I will move the report to confluence tomorrow after @JialinQiao finishing
> releasing 0.9.0.
>
> If Jialin can not finish the release tomorrow, I think I have to remove
> related content…
The report can be updated before the board meets or you can just put it in the
next report, in theory
Hi,
I will move the report to confluence tomorrow after @JialinQiao finishing
releasing 0.9.0.
If Jialin can not finish the release tomorrow, I think I have to remove
related content...
@Kevin interesting slogan... Luckily we are not a military. :D
Best,
---
Xian
https://federalnewsnetwork.com/federal-report/2012/09/the-beatings-will-continue-until-morale-improves/
On 11/30/2019 11:57 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
>> I gives a high score for enhancing morale :D.
--
Kevin A. McGrail
kmcgr...@apache.org
Member, Apache Software Foundation
Chair Emeritus Apache
Hi,
> I gives a high score for enhancing morale :D.
:-) As long as you keep making progress all is good.
> We can remove it in the formal report. Indeed we need to try our best to
> make it come true.
I’ve not issue if it leftest in, it is a report from where the podling things
is is along the
Hi,
>> If rate the maturity from 0 (initial steup) to 10 (can graduate), the
>> reporter thinks it can be around 4.5.
> I don’t think this podling is quite at that point yet, but good progress
has been made.
I gives a high score for enhancing morale :D.
We can remove it in the formal report. In
Hi,
> Some questions like "How does the podling rate their own maturity" is
> quite subjective, so I use "from the reporter's view" or "the reporter
> thinks". Please comment your idea, and I will modify the draft.
I would just answer for the whole PMC and if anyone disagrees they can raise it
a
Hi,
Good report. Given the number of contributions does the PMC think there’s
anyone who could be offered committership?
You missed a question about branding, this has been added recently. Please
check the template in confluence [1] rather than copying the previous report.
Thanks,
Justin
1.
Looks like a good report to me. Let me know when you have put it into
confluence so I can sign off.
On 11/30/2019 9:06 PM, Xiangdong Huang wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please review the draft of the report of December2019.
>
> (Some questions like "How does the podling rate their own maturity" is
> quite sub
Hi,
Please review the draft of the report of December2019.
(Some questions like "How does the podling rate their own maturity" is
quite subjective, so I use "from the reporter's view" or "the reporter
thinks". Please comment your idea, and I will modify the draft.)
# IoTDB
# A brief description
Dear podling,
This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache
Incubator PMC. It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to
prepare your quarterly board report.
The board meeting is scheduled for Wed, 18 December 2019, 10:30 am PDT.
The report for your podling will for
Dear podling,
This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache
Incubator PMC. It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to
prepare your quarterly board report.
The board meeting is scheduled for Wed, 18 December 2019, 10:30 am PDT.
The report for your podling will for
Dear podling,
This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache
Incubator PMC. It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to
prepare your quarterly board report.
The board meeting is scheduled for Wed, 18 December 2019, 10:30 am PDT.
The report for your podling will for
19 matches
Mail list logo
