Hi，
I agree with you, 'cli' is better.
Thanks.
runhus...@foxmail.com
From: Xiangdong Huang
Date: 2020-04-28 18:51
To: dev
Subject: Re: may we rename the package client to another name?
Hi,
> Can we move the client project to server and just use Linux shell to
determine whether to st
Hi,
> Can we move the client project to server and just use Linux shell to
determine whether to start the client Main or server Main
It is not a good idea.
If you have ever installed MySQL on Debian or Ubuntu or MacOS, you will
know we can install the server and client tool separately.
e.g.,
Hi,
Can we move the client project to server and just use Linux shell to determine
whether to start the client Main or server Main
Thanks
---
Dawei Liu
On 04/28/2020 17:59，Xiangdong Huang wrote：
Hi,
I think the suggestion is acceptable.
"IoTDB-shell" is not quite good because other
Hi,
I think the suggestion is acceptable.
"IoTDB-shell" is not quite good because other modules do not start with
"iotdb"...
But "shell" is ambiguous.
How about "cli" (client command line)?
Best,
---
Xiangdong Huang
School of Software, Tsinghua University
黄向东
Hi，
I found the package client only has the logical about the shell tools to
connect to the iotdb server. The name 'client' always make me think it as
client sdk for user to connect to server to
insert or query.
May we rename the package to another name, like iotdb-shell, and also rename
