2??extreme
-- --
??: "Xiangwei Wei"https://github.com/apache/iotdb/pull/3289
--
Best,
Xiangwei Wei
Hi,
+1 for #2. extreme
+0 for #3. ext_value
-1 for #1. ext
Steve Su
-- Original --
From: "dev" ;
Date: Wed, Jun 2, 2021 10:51 AM
To: "dev";
Subject: Re: [Discussion] The aggregation function name of getting extreme value
Welcome to vote and any discussion. :D
Xi
+1 for extreme
--
Jialin Qiao
School of Software, Tsinghua University
乔嘉林
清华大学 软件学院
> -原始邮件-
> 发件人: "Steve Su"
> 发送时间: 2021-06-03 09:23:55 (星期四)
> 收件人: dev
> 抄送:
> 主题: Re: [Discussion] The aggregation function name of getting extreme value
>
> Hi,
>
> +1 for #2. extreme
> +0 for #3
+1 for extreme
| |
Chao Wang
|
|
[email protected]
|
签名由网易邮箱大师定制
On 6/3/2021 09:40，Jialin Qiao wrote：
+1 for extreme
--
Jialin Qiao
School of Software, Tsinghua University
乔嘉林
清华大学 软件学院
> -原始邮件-
> 发件人: "Steve Su"
> 发送时间: 2021-06-03 09:23:55 (星期四)
> 收件人: dev
> 抄送:
> 主题: Re: [Discussio
+1 for extreme
Xiangwei Wei 于2021年6月2日周三 上午10:50写道：
> Hi guys,
>
> We plan to add a new aggregation function, whose function is to take the
> extreme value, that is, to return the maximum absolute value (the preferred
> positive value). The typical use scenario is the vibration amplitude of the
Hi all,
Recently our CI works well (except one case on Win),
but many CI failed because the code coverage rate threshold is 80% on
sonarcloud.io...
Many PRs do not meet the threshold.
So, should we reduce the threshold? e.g., to 70%,
or keep it and require all PRs to obey the threshold?
PR examp
+1 extreme_value
+0 extreme
-1 ext
On Thu, 3 Jun 2021 at 9:55 AM, Mark Liu wrote:
> +1 for extreme
>
> Xiangwei Wei 于2021年6月2日周三 上午10:50写道：
>
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > We plan to add a new aggregation function, whose function is to take the
> > extreme value, that is, to return the maximum absolute
BUILD-UNSTABLE: Job 'IoTDB/IoTDB-Pipe/master [master] [246]':
Check console output at "https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/IoTDB/job/IoTDB-Pipe/job/master/246/";>IoTDB/IoTDB-Pipe/master
[master] [246]"
