This is a good compromise IMHO.
Jeremy D. Branham
Tel: **DOTNET
-Original Message-
From: Dan Haywood [mailto:d...@haywood-associates.co.uk]
Sent: Saturday, January 03, 2015 7:27 AM
To: users
Cc: dev@isis.apache.org
Subject: Re: ISIS-970 ... (new annotations) please review if you get a c
ency direction (i.e. disallow PD --> UI).
Applications should reinforce the layer separation via package naming
convention. e.g.
com.mycompany.myapp.pd.*com.mycompany.myapp.ui.*
David.
On Thursday, 1 January 2015 3:24 AM, "Branham, Jeremy [HR]"
wrote:
What would it look
What would it look like with @Model?
Giving more specificity than ‘Object’ but opening the interpretation to
Entities and ViewModels.
Or am I overlooking something? [I am new to Isis]
(fyi - there is a name clash with Model in Spring-MVC)
Jeremy D. Branham
Tel: **DOTNET
From: Jeroen van der W
