[jira] Resolved: (JCR-416) Webdav Simple: Delegate PROPPATCH to (extended) IOHandlers

2006-08-15 Thread angela (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-416?page=all ] angela resolved JCR-416. Resolution: Fixed commited changes with rev. 431546 : server/io package: - new interfaces PropertyManager, PropertyHandler, PropertyImportContext, PropertyExportContext. - the

Re: Adding a method to PropInfos

2006-08-15 Thread Nicolas
Hi I am working on a backup and restore tool for Jackrabbit. It's why I need to escape all checks since I am writing protected node (for this reason). What is your other idea about this please? BR Nicolas my blog! http://www.deviant-abstraction.net !! On 8/15/06, Stefan Guggisberg [EMAIL

Re: Adding a method to PropInfos

2006-08-15 Thread Jukka Zitting
Hi, On 8/15/06, Nicolas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am working on a backup and restore tool for Jackrabbit. It's why I need to escape all checks since I am writing protected node (for this reason). Could you elaborate on the details, i.e. why you chose the system view XML format for the

Re: Adding a method to PropInfos

2006-08-15 Thread Nicolas
Of course. Actually the backup tool is backupping all workspaces and the version node histories using the XML system view. The advantage of this approach are: easiness to check the backup is correct, easiness to modify a backup if needed, built as much as possible on JCR and a little bit on

Re: Litmus setup to run against jackrabbit

2006-08-15 Thread Angela Schreiber
David Kennedy wrote: I'm trying to run litmus against my jackrabbit webdav install, but am getting a Forbidden response when the litmus begin test attempts to run delete and/or mkcol for 'litmus'. Is there something I need to change about the litmus tests to run them against jackrabbit?

Re: Litmus setup to run against jackrabbit

2006-08-15 Thread David Kennedy
Angela Schreiber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 08/15/2006 09:37:19 AM: David Kennedy wrote: I'm trying to run litmus against my jackrabbit webdav install, but am getting a Forbidden response when the litmus begin test attempts to run delete and/or mkcol for 'litmus'. Is there something I

Re: Litmus setup to run against jackrabbit

2006-08-15 Thread Angela Schreiber
David Kennedy wrote: I'm running JCRWebdavServerServlet (not the simple server). hm. this doesn't make sense from my point of view. litmus expects that a MKCOL can be performed without request body, that a simple file can be created and modified and last but not least that any kind of

Re: Litmus setup to run against jackrabbit

2006-08-15 Thread David Kennedy
Angela Schreiber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 08/15/2006 10:21:46 AM: David Kennedy wrote: I'm running JCRWebdavServerServlet (not the simple server). hm. this doesn't make sense from my point of view. I guess you're saying it doesn't make sense that I'd be running litmus against the

Status of the backup tool

2006-08-15 Thread Nicolas
Hello, I am really happy to announce you that the backup tool is working both on restore and backup. I will clean up all classes in the next few days and post the patches when the few and minor modifications have been approved by the ML BR, Nico my blog! http://www.deviant-abstraction.net !!

Re: package.html file found in the development tree

2006-08-15 Thread Jukka Zitting
Hi, On 8/15/06, Nicolas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I guess this is a (really minor) mistake: you can find a Javadoc file package.html in the current development tree: No mistake at all, it's an essential part of the core documentation. See

Re: package.html file found in the development tree

2006-08-15 Thread Nicolas
Oops sorry... Usually I completely separate Javadoc from the source. Nico my blog! http://www.deviant-abstraction.net !! On 8/15/06, Jukka Zitting [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, On 8/15/06, Nicolas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I guess this is a (really minor) mistake: you can find a Javadoc file