[jira] Resolved: (JCR-627) Deprecated Serializer does not properly delegate method calls.

2006-11-24 Thread Jukka Zitting (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-627?page=all ] Jukka Zitting resolved JCR-627. --- Resolution: Fixed > Deprecated Serializer does not properly delegate method calls. > -- > >

[jira] Updated: (JCR-627) Deprecated Serializer does not properly delegate method calls.

2006-11-24 Thread Jukka Zitting (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-627?page=all ] Jukka Zitting updated JCR-627: -- Component/s: core Fix Version/s: 1.2 (was: 1.1.1) Affects Version/s: (was: 1.1.1) > Deprecated Serializer does not pro

[jira] Reopened: (JCR-627) Deprecated Serializer does not properly delegate method calls.

2006-11-24 Thread Jukka Zitting (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-627?page=all ] Jukka Zitting reopened JCR-627: --- Reopening to fix issue metadata > Deprecated Serializer does not properly delegate method calls. >

Re: Import in versionStorage

2006-11-24 Thread Jukka Zitting
Hi, On 11/24/06, Nicolas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The best option would be for you to wait a little bit :) ... and all contributions are always very much welcome! :-) BR, Jukka Zitting

Re: Import in versionStorage

2006-11-24 Thread Nicolas
Hi, Actually, there is a way but it is a rather ugly hack. I am currently working to integrate the backup tool within the core and without this hack (which mainly mean solving the problem you encounter). The best option would be for you to wait a little bit :) Several threads already discuss thi

Import in versionStorage

2006-11-24 Thread SADAUNE Frederique (EURIWARE)
Hi, I want to import documents in Jackrabbit's repository but I don't manage to import their different versions. Is there another way than checkout(),checkin() ? The backup tool sends a ConstraintViolationException due to the node's protected property when trying to import directly on the versio

Re: JackRabbit performance tests report

2006-11-24 Thread Jukka Zitting
Hi, On 11/24/06, Stefan Gruszczynski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 'custom importer' - will it be avaliable in jackrabbit? I've done a few custom importers for various customer projects. They're not that complex (<<1kLOC) since it's generally possible to ignore much of the spec requirements when

[jira] Resolved: (JCR-576) Close Connection when I use PersistenManager and FileSystem with mysql database

2006-11-24 Thread Stefan Guggisberg (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-576?page=all ] Stefan Guggisberg resolved JCR-576. --- Resolution: Duplicate resolving as duplicate of JCR-645 which adresses the issue at hand (recovering from jdbc connection loss) > Close Connection when I u

[jira] Resolved: (JCR-645) DatabasePersistenceManager & DatabaseFileSystem: try to gracefully recover from connection loss

2006-11-24 Thread Stefan Guggisberg (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-645?page=all ] Stefan Guggisberg resolved JCR-645. --- Resolution: Fixed fixed in svn r478892 the new implementation tries to reconnect and re-execute the failing stmt after a SQLException had been encountered.

Re: JackRabbit performance tests report

2006-11-24 Thread Stefan Gruszczynski
'custom importer' - will it be avaliable in jackrabbit? What are your results in importing large XML files? /largest file ever imported and import time/ And what about SAXParser which is not thread-safe? BR, Stefan Gruszczynski

Re: JackRabbit performance tests report

2006-11-24 Thread Jukka Zitting
Hi, On 11/24/06, Stefan Gruszczynski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: So if not RMI than what? Did you or anybody else performed any performance tests not based on RMI? I think the most frequently used deployment models for Jackrabbit are models 1 and 2 where the repository is running within the sam

Re: JackRabbit performance tests report

2006-11-24 Thread Jukka Zitting
Hi, On 11/24/06, Marcin Nowak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Recently I've performed some common tests of JackRabbit performance. Results of these tests can be seen in attached files. I would like to hear your comment - and you answer on point 4.4 Suggestions and wishes. Thanks a lot for sharing t

Re: JackRabbit performance tests report

2006-11-24 Thread Stefan Gruszczynski
So if not RMI than what? Did you or anybody else performed any performance tests not based on RMI? I think that some of those tests are not affected by RMI disadvantages /i.e. deleting nodes or pasring XML documents/ because those operations are running on server side only - without or with small

Re: JackRabbit performance tests report

2006-11-24 Thread Stefan Gruszczynski
Hi, The same code was adjusted to each test, so currently I don't have whole package, but if you wish I can restore it. Code was very simple and it was using only classes from most current version of JackRabbit, if not - version was mentioned in raport. I think that I didn't created any overhead

Re: JackRabbit performance tests report

2006-11-24 Thread Jukka Zitting
Hi, On 11/24/06, Marcin Nowak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Recently I've performed some common tests of JackRabbit performance. Results of these tests can be seen in attached files. I would like to hear your comment - and you answer on point 4.4 Suggestions and wishes. I'm looking forward to your

Re: JackRabbit performance tests report

2006-11-24 Thread Stefan Guggisberg
On 11/24/06, Marcin Nowak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, Recently I've performed some common tests of JackRabbit performance. Results of these tests can be seen in attached files. I would like to hear your comment - and you answer on point 4.4 Suggestions and wishes. I'm looking forward to your

Re: JackRabbit performance tests report

2006-11-24 Thread Thomas Mueller
Hi, Did you already submit the source code of those tests? If yes, could you provide a link? Thanks, Thomas On 11/24/06, Marcin Nowak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, Recently I've performed some common tests of JackRabbit performance. Results of these tests can be seen in attached files. I wo

[jira] Commented: (JCR-626) Move document type definition out of repository.xml

2006-11-24 Thread Jan Kuzniak (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-626?page=comments#action_12452426 ] Jan Kuzniak commented on JCR-626: - Hello, I am currently finishing implementation of JCR-202 and I created new repository.xml files here and there for tests. Should I

[jira] Created: (JCR-645) DatabasePersistenceManager & DatabaseFileSystem: try to gracefully recover from connection loss

2006-11-24 Thread Stefan Guggisberg (JIRA)
DatabasePersistenceManager & DatabaseFileSystem: try to gracefully recover from connection loss Key: JCR-645 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-645

[jira] Commented: (JCR-644) Node.isNodeType() throws if namespace is not defined.

2006-11-24 Thread Jukka Zitting (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-644?page=comments#action_12452391 ] Jukka Zitting commented on JCR-644: --- > I think that the would initially setup his namespaces to be mapped on a > session basis to > whatever makes sense for the app

[jira] Commented: (JCR-644) Node.isNodeType() throws if namespace is not defined.

2006-11-24 Thread David Nuescheler (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-644?page=comments#action_12452387 ] David Nuescheler commented on JCR-644: -- I think that the would initially setup his namespaces to be mapped on a session basis to whatever makes sense for the ap