[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-970?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Felix Meschberger updated JCR-970:
--
Attachment: JCR-970.diff
Proposed fix.
> ClassDescriptor.getDescendantClassDescriptor may throw a
ClassDescriptor.getDescendantClassDescriptor may throw a NullPointerException
-
Key: JCR-970
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-970
Project: Jackrabbit
I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-968?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12503674
]
Jukka Zitting commented on JCR-968:
---
Looks good to me. Thanks for the contribution!
The only problem I have with the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-968?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jukka Zitting updated JCR-968:
--
Assignee: Jukka Zitting
Priority: Minor (was: Major)
Affects Version/s: (was
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-969?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jukka Zitting resolved JCR-969.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Good point. Patch applied in revision 546313. Thanks!
> better error for unknown date
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-969?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jukka Zitting updated JCR-969:
--
Component/s: core
Fix Version/s: 1.4
Assignee: Jukka Zitting
Priori
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-969?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Daniel Naber updated JCR-969:
-
Attachment: jackrabbit-date.diff
better exception
> better error for unknown date formats
> ---
better error for unknown date formats
-
Key: JCR-969
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-969
Project: Jackrabbit
Issue Type: Improvement
Affects Versions: 1.4
Reporter: Daniel Na
On 6/11/07, Jukka Zitting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Do you have some good forum in mind for initiating such discussions,
or should we just start pinging other projects to gauge interest?...
I didn't have any particular forum in mind...maybe some cross-posted
discussion between Lucene, Der
Hi,
On 6/11/07, Bertrand Delacretaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/11/07, Thomas Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...It sounds like MVCC (multi version concurrency control) in databases
> ...Of course we don't need to rebuild a database, but maybe reuse
> some ideas...
These snippets,
Hi,
On 6/11/07, Thomas Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It sounds like MVCC (multi version concurrency control) in databases.
Yes, MVCC was one of my inspirations (see [1]), although I must admit
that I only know MVCC on a high level.
[1] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.jackrabbi
On 6/11/07, Thomas Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...It sounds like MVCC (multi version concurrency control) in databases
...Of course we don't need to rebuild a database, but maybe reuse some ideas...
These snippets, and the similarities between Jackrabbit's storage and
databases,
Hi,
It sounds like MVCC (multi version concurrency control) in databases.
Question: in your view, do we need to change the PersistenceManager
API as well?
* Removing nodes *
Last section: when removing B, the child C is removed as well. Is it
important to say 'remove C', and not 'remove B includ
Hi,
My first year as the PMC chair will be over in two months, and while
I'd love to continue serving in that capacity it would be great if
also other interested PMC members had the same chance to learn more
about the internal workings of the ASF.
So, assuming there is interested, I propose that
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-968?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Martijn Hendriks updated JCR-968:
-
Attachment: JCR-968.patch
Attached is a patch that provides a possible solution.
> Add support for
Add support for tablespaces to Oracle related classes
-
Key: JCR-968
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-968
Project: Jackrabbit
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: cor
Hi,
On 6/4/07, Jukka Zitting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jackrabbit 1.3.1 will be a patch release with selected bug fixes from
the svn trunk. No features or other improvements will be included in
1.3.1. I will soon start grooming the issue tracker for the release
and merging the selected fixes to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-874?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jukka Zitting updated JCR-874:
--
Fix Version/s: (was: 1.3.1)
> Move & copy objects
> ---
>
> Key: JCR-8
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-967?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12503359
]
Paco Avila commented on JCR-967:
Ups, I didn't notice it. So, this would be a huge performance improvement on
searchs..
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-967?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12503354
]
Christoph Kiehl commented on JCR-967:
-
Even if you do exclude jcr:system in your query jackrabbit currently searches
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-967?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12503349
]
Paco Avila commented on JCR-967:
But you can exclude jcr:system from the search query, isn't it? In my
application my q
Marcel Reutegger wrote:
1. Wouldn't it make sense to exclude the index for the "jcr:system"
tree (which is located at repository/index by default) if the query to
execute doesn't include items from the "jcr:system" tree.
Take for example a query like "my:app//element(*, foo:bar)". This
query o
Only search the index for the "jcr:system" tree if needed
-
Key: JCR-967
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-967
Project: Jackrabbit
Issue Type: Improvement
Compone
Hello JCR delveopers
Sent this to the user list a couple of days ago and got no response.
Is the developer list a better place for this question?
Thanks
Derek
Hello and please pardon me if this is already in an FAQ somewhere (I
have looked but did not find anything that really answers this).
Wh
Hi Christoph,
Christoph Kiehl wrote:
I had a look at the search related code during the last days, because we
need better performance for range queries on date fields as well as for
sorting by date fields. These are my thoughts so far:
1. Wouldn't it make sense to exclude the index for the "j
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-929?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dominique Pfister resolved JCR-929.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Thanks Ian, for pointing out that one! Tests now pass smoothly.
Fixed in rev
26 matches
Mail list logo
