Just one comment :
The OCM has to be completely independent of Jackrabbit core. By this
way, it can be used with other JCR implementation. As you can see,
Jackrabbit core is only used for the unit tests.
That's why the code is so ugly ... until there is a standard way to
add new node types.
br,
C
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1336?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Christophe Lombart resolved JCR-1336.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 1.5
Patch applied. Thanks
Sorry for the delay. Can
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1336?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Christophe Lombart reassigned JCR-1336:
---
Assignee: Christophe Lombart
> Bug in duplicate mapping check
> ---
Hi,
I fix this problem. Can you check if it is ok for you ?
In stead of calling the method retrieveSimpleFields, I only refresh
the path and the uuid field.
thanks,
Christophe
2008/3/11 Yonder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
>
> Unlike Hibernate, ObjectContentManager cannot retrieve the path or uui
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1385?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Christophe Lombart resolved JCR-1385.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 1.5
I just fixed this issue. Can you check if it is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1381?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Christophe Lombart updated JCR-1381:
Fix Version/s: 1.5
> Path is not indexed when inserting a new node with SNS
> ---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1381?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Christophe Lombart resolved JCR-1381.
-
Resolution: Fixed
I just fixed this issue. Can you check if it is ok for you ?
Now, the pa
Hi Alex,
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 10:32 PM, Alex Lukin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As allways, should I create Jira issue with this?
Please, yes. I'm very busy with other activities and it will be a
great help and ...
if possible with a patch :-) That's the fast way to improve the code.
Thank
Hi, All, Hi, Christophe!
I just took a look at new OCM docs at
http://jackrabbit.apache.org/5-with-jackrabbit-ocm.html
I must say taht ugly init code for annotation based OCM may be and must be
hidden.
In my application I created needed xml file and placed it in same package
where OCM init
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1385?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Christophe Lombart reassigned JCR-1385:
---
Assignee: Christophe Lombart
> UUID field not populated when saving a new node
> --
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1381?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Christophe Lombart reassigned JCR-1381:
---
Assignee: Christophe Lombart
> Path is not indexed when inserting a new node with SNS
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1388?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Esteban Franqueiro updated JCR-1388:
Attachment: JCR-1388-datastore-concurrent-reads.10.patch
Oops, wrong file. Here is the right
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1388?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Esteban Franqueiro updated JCR-1388:
Attachment: (was: JCR-1388-datastore-concurrent-reads.9.patch)
> Jackrabbit does not allo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1388?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Esteban Franqueiro updated JCR-1388:
Attachment: JCR-1388-datastore-concurrent-reads.9.patch
> As I wrote before, I suggest you us
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 5:16 PM, Angela Schreiber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> anyway, you didn't get my mail. you can't mark it beta or preview
> since it affects the very fundamentals. it's there or
> it isn't i don't see any room for 'relative' here ;)
There's always a range from to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1462?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12577480#action_12577480
]
Marcel Reutegger commented on JCR-1462:
---
I tend to agree that the repository should not
Jukka Zitting wrote:
From my perspective the main criteria between having this in trunk or
a development branch is its impact on Jackrabbit 1.5. If we bring the
ACL work to the trunk, then the feature would becomes a major part of
the Jackrabbit 1.5 roadmap and it should be in a relatively usabl
Thomas Mueller wrote:
Hi,
I agree with Esteban, as long as the current tests pass I would add it
to the trunk.
i would not have suggested to commit it to trunk if there
were existing test failing (apart from those that failed
before -> see the restoreTest bug).
my point is: i'm sure there wi
Online report :
http://jackrabbit.zones.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=3167&projectId=2
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Ok
Started at: Tue 11 Mar 2008 14:48:44 +
Finished at: Tue 11 Mar 2008 14:56:50 +
Total time: 8m 5s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Buil
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1462?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12577465#action_12577465
]
Thomas Mueller commented on JCR-1462:
-
Committed in revision 635940.
This is a 'proof of
Hi,
On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 8:11 PM, Angela Schreiber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> what's your preference?
My number one wish is to bring the development effort the the
Jackrabbit svn, so I prefer both having it in trunk or a development
branch better than keeping something as large as this as pa
Hi,
Unlike Hibernate, ObjectContentManager cannot retrieve the path or uuid field
of an newly persistent object. In my project, I insert the following code after
line 221 in ObjectConverterImpl.java and I got the correct value:
simpleFieldsHelp.retrieveSimpleFields(session, classDescriptor,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1375?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Marcel Reutegger updated JCR-1375:
--
Fix Version/s: (was: 1.5)
core 1.4.2
When there are stored fields with sig
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 10:34 AM, Thilina Buddhika <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am really interested in Apache Jackrabbit project. I have been building
> some applications on top of Jackrabbit, and I am realizing the potential of
> Jackrabbit. So I thought of doing a GSoC project based on
24 matches
Mail list logo
