Re: Incubating Chemistry (Was: IP clearance for the Chemistry contribution)

2009-04-21 Thread Dominique Pfister
Hi, On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 12:12 AM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote: * Anyone else interested in joining as an initial committer? Dominique? It's of course possible to join also later, but then we'll need to go through the standard from-patches-to-committership process. Oops,

Re: Incubating Chemistry (Was: IP clearance for the Chemistry contribution)

2009-04-21 Thread Serge Huber
I am very interested in this project also, but I think it would be much too early for me to get commitership on this, as I need to first prove myself again, as an alumni of Jackrabbit :) Regards, Serge

[jira] Updated: (JCR-2057) When creating multiple repository instances pointing to the same home, opening a second session will remove the .lock file

2009-04-21 Thread Jukka Zitting (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-2057?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jukka Zitting updated JCR-2057: --- Fix Version/s: (was: 1.6.0) 1.5.5 Merged to the 1.5 branch in revision 767069.

[jira] Updated: (JCR-2071) IndexMerger throws null pointer exception without stacktrace

2009-04-21 Thread Jukka Zitting (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-2071?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jukka Zitting updated JCR-2071: --- Component/s: jackrabbit-core Fix Version/s: (was: 1.6.0) 1.5.5 Merged to

Re: Jackrabbit 1.5.5 release plan

2009-04-21 Thread Jukka Zitting
Hi, On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 10:11 AM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote: More generally, with the 1.5.4 release candidate tagged and out for review, I'm moving forward with the 1.5.5 release. I'm just reviewing the last pending commits in trunk. Michael is still looking at some SPI

Re: Jackrabbit 1.5.5 release plan

2009-04-21 Thread Frank van Lankvelt
Hi Jukka, could issue JCR-2016 (jcr2spi) be considered for inclusion? There is a patch attached that fixes some faults in the update processing. I.e. a correct update leads to an incorrect state. thanks, Frank On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 12:07 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.comwrote: Hi,

[jira] Updated: (JCR-2048) Workspace is shut down while creating initial index

2009-04-21 Thread Jukka Zitting (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-2048?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jukka Zitting updated JCR-2048: --- Fix Version/s: (was: 1.6.0) 1.5.5 Merged to the 1.5 branch in revision 767106.

[jira] Updated: (JCR-1216) Unreferenced sessions should get garbage collected

2009-04-21 Thread Jukka Zitting (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1216?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jukka Zitting updated JCR-1216: --- Issue Type: Bug (was: Improvement) Merged to the 1.5 branch in revision 767119. Unreferenced

Hudson build became unstable: Jac krabbit-1.5 » Jackrabbit Core #50

2009-04-21 Thread Apache Hudson Server
See http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Jackrabbit-1.5/org.apache.jackrabbit$jackrabbit-core/50/

Hudson build is still unstable: Ja ckrabbit-1.5 » Jackrabbit Core #51

2009-04-21 Thread Apache Hudson Server
See http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Jackrabbit-1.5/org.apache.jackrabbit$jackrabbit-core/51/

Re: Incubating Chemistry (Was: IP clearance for the Chemistry contribution)

2009-04-21 Thread Jukka Zitting
Hi, On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 9:59 AM, Serge Huber shub...@jahia.com wrote: I am very interested in this project also, but I think it would be much too early for me to get commitership on this, as I need to first prove myself again, as an alumni of Jackrabbit :) Cool, you're welcome to join as

JCR 2.0

2009-04-21 Thread Julian Reschke
Hi there. Now that JSR-283 is in public review, do we have a plan how to get the Jackrabbit trunk implement the JCR 2.0 API? Best regards, Julian

Re: JCR 2.0

2009-04-21 Thread Jukka Zitting
Hi, On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 3:29 PM, Julian Reschke julian.resc...@gmx.de wrote: Now that JSR-283 is in public review, do we have a plan how to get the Jackrabbit trunk implement the JCR 2.0 API? Not yet a written plan, but I'd like to branch Jackrabbit 1.6 in a few weeks after which we can

Re: JCR 2.0

2009-04-21 Thread Torgeir Veimo
What about soft references, they would be easy to do without waiting for jackrabbit 2.0? 2009/4/21 Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com Hi, On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 3:29 PM, Julian Reschke julian.resc...@gmx.de wrote: Now that JSR-283 is in public review, do we have a plan how to get the

Re: Incubating Chemistry (Was: IP clearance for the Chemistry contribution)

2009-04-21 Thread Jukka Zitting
Hi, On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 12:12 AM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote: I'll now ping the gene...@incubator.apache.org list for some early comments on the proposal. See http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.incubator.general/21727 for the Incubator thread. There are some

Re: JCR 2.0

2009-04-21 Thread Tobias Bocanegra
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 3:57 PM, Torgeir Veimo torg...@pobox.com wrote: What about soft references, they would be easy to do without waiting for jackrabbit 2.0? the new property types have a great impact (core, persistence, api, tests, etc) and we wanted to wait until 1.6 is branched. regards,

Re: Incubating Chemistry (Was: IP clearance for the Chemistry contribution)

2009-04-21 Thread Serge Huber
I might be jumping the gun a little, but if this can help, here are a few name suggestions : Apache Plug Apache Content Plug Apache Jackplug Apache Sea Miss (ok it's an awful word game :)) (or could be written Seamis, or Seemis) Apache Startle (Jackrabbit synonym) But I must admit the

Re: Incubating Chemistry (Was: IP clearance for the Chemistry contribution)

2009-04-21 Thread Torgeir Veimo
It is a play on the letters; CheMIStry. 2009/4/22 Serge Huber shub...@jahia.com I might be jumping the gun a little, but if this can help, here are a few name suggestions : Apache Plug Apache Content Plug Apache Jackplug Apache Sea Miss (ok it's an awful word game :)) (or could be

Re: Incubating Chemistry (Was: IP clearance for the Chemistry contribution)

2009-04-21 Thread Serge Huber
Thank you Torgeir, I remember this being mentioned a while ago, but I was mostly hoping to help if need be. But I would miss the current name, as I agree it is good :) Regards, Serge Huber. On 21 avr. 09, at 16:36, Torgeir Veimo wrote: It is a play on the letters; CheMIStry. 2009/4/22

Re: Incubating Chemistry (Was: IP clearance for the Chemistry contribution)

2009-04-21 Thread Jukka Zitting
Hi, On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 4:40 PM, Serge Huber shub...@jahia.com wrote: But I would miss the current name, as I agree it is good :) Me too. How about if we just slightly modified it, say to Apache Chemi or something similar? BR, Jukka Zitting

Re: Incubating Chemistry (Was: IP clearance for the Chemistry contribution)

2009-04-21 Thread Serge Huber
or Chemis ? Regards, Serge Huber. On 21 avr. 09, at 16:43, Jukka Zitting wrote: Hi, On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 4:40 PM, Serge Huber shub...@jahia.com wrote: But I would miss the current name, as I agree it is good :) Me too. How about if we just slightly modified it, say to Apache Chemi

Re: Incubating Chemistry (Was: IP clearance for the Chemistry contribution)

2009-04-21 Thread Julian Reschke
Jukka Zitting wrote: Hi, On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 4:40 PM, Serge Huber shub...@jahia.com wrote: But I would miss the current name, as I agree it is good :) Me too. How about if we just slightly modified it, say to Apache Chemi or something similar? Chemist BR, Julian (helping to paint the

Re: Incubating Chemistry (Was: IP clearance for the Chemistry contribution)

2009-04-21 Thread Gianugo Rabellino
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 12:12 AM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote: * We now only have volunteer mentors from Day. The normal diversity rules don't really apply to mentors, but it would still be good to have someone with a different perspective join us as a mentor. Note that you

Jackrabbit 1.6 release plan

2009-04-21 Thread Jukka Zitting
Hi, As noted in various recent threads, we're getting closer to branching and releasing Jackrabbit 1.6. There are no major blockers to 1.6 so we should be able to move fairly quickly with the release. We had some earlier plans about including a content browser/editor or implementing database

Jackrabbit 2.0 release plan

2009-04-21 Thread Jukka Zitting
Hi, As a followup to the Jackrabbit 1.6 release plan I sent earlier, here's a quick roadmap towards Jackrabbit 2.0. Once the 1.x branch has been created on April 30th, we will upgrade the JCR dependency in trunk to the JCR 2.0 jar included in the JSR 283 proposed final draft. This will replace

Re: Incubating Chemistry (Was: IP clearance for the Chemistry contribution)

2009-04-21 Thread Thomas Müller
Hi, I downloaded a word list from http://wordlist.sourceforge.net and ran: grep -i -R --include=* -E 'c.?m.?i.?s' . grep -i -R --include=* 'c.*m.*i[^s]*s' . This got me a long list, including: chromis cinematics combfish comics commissar crimison blackmails buckminster occamist (from Occam's

Re: Jackrabbit 1.5.5 release plan

2009-04-21 Thread Jukka Zitting
Hi, On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Frank van Lankvelt f.vanlankv...@onehippo.com wrote: could issue JCR-2016 (jcr2spi) be considered for inclusion?  There is a patch attached that fixes some faults in the update processing.  I.e. a correct update leads to an incorrect state. Sure, sorry

Re: Incubating Chemistry (Was: IP clearance for the Chemistry contribution)

2009-04-21 Thread Jukka Zitting
Hi, On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 4:53 PM, Gianugo Rabellino g.rabell...@sourcesense.com wrote: On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 12:12 AM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote: * We now only have volunteer mentors from Day. The normal diversity rules don't really apply to mentors, but it would still

Re: Jackrabbit 2.0 release plan

2009-04-21 Thread Julian Reschke
Jukka Zitting wrote: Hi, As a followup to the Jackrabbit 1.6 release plan I sent earlier, here's a quick roadmap towards Jackrabbit 2.0. ... +1 on the specific plan, and also thanks a lot for doing the planning work! BR, Julian

Re: Naming Chemistry

2009-04-21 Thread Lennard Fuller
+1 Chemistry - Original Message - From: Florent Guillaume f...@nuxeo.com To: dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2009 10:00:33 AM GMT -07:00 U.S. Mountain Time (Arizona) Subject: Re: Naming Chemistry Hi, I'm hope you'll forgive me, but I won't contribute to this

Re: Jackrabbit 1.5.5 release plan

2009-04-21 Thread Frank van Lankvelt
thanks for reviewing! Sorry about the absense of a test, I'll have to look into how to do that. I guess it should be possible by creating a mock repository service to fabricate the updates(?) Frank On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 6:00 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.comwrote: Hi, On Tue, Apr

Re: Naming Chemistry

2009-04-21 Thread Felix Meschberger
Hi all, Having followed this a bit, I am feeling a bit uncomfortable with all the proposals. I have to say, that I like Chemistry quite a bit (and it immediately sounds and looks like CMIS). Now for potential mixup with CDK: I agree with Florent that there is probably not a big chance for

Re: Naming Chemistry

2009-04-21 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 7:00 PM, Florent Guillaume f...@nuxeo.com wrote: ...I contend that Chemistry is good enough. +1 Chemistry Development Kit (CDK) is sufficiently different from Apache Chemistry. And about Chemistry in general...there's that thing called Windows somewhere, but it's not