[jira] Updated: (JCR-2195) Provide possibility to import protected items using Session/Workspace import functionality

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-2195?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] angela updated JCR-2195: Priority: Blocker (was: Major) Fix Version/s: 2.0.0 > Provide possibility to import protected items using S

Re: Jackrabbit 2.0 release plan

Hi, I'll be doing another Jackrabbit 2.0 alpha tomorrow. The JCR 2.0 API jar is now officially available from the JCP (see [1]), and I'm hoping to get the jar uploaded to Maven central within a few days. After that I would like to switch from the source-only alpha releases we've been doing to a s

[VOTE] Release Jackrabbit parent POM version 5

Hi, Our latest releases have suffered from some broken Maven checksums as described in JCR-2310. The easiest way to fix the problem is simply to release new versions of the affected components. The first one is the Jackrabbit parent POM, that also has a few entry updates (Julian, Sébastien) since

[jira] Commented: (JCR-2310) Jackrabbit Maven Artifacts have false checksums

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-2310?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12760634#action_12760634 ] Jukka Zitting commented on JCR-2310: It looks like the easiest solution is simply to publ

[jira] Updated: (JCR-1946) JCAResourceAdapter must implement Serializable

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1946?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jukka Zitting updated JCR-1946: --- Priority: Major (was: Blocker) Not a blocker as this only affects specific environments. Would anyone

[jira] Updated: (JCR-2226) Exceptions using DB based repository with WAS 6.1

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-2226?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jukka Zitting updated JCR-2226: --- Priority: Minor (was: Blocker) Not a blocker as this only affects specific environments. As a workaro

Re: JCROM and Jackrabbit OCM

Hi, On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 9:12 PM, Jason Thrasher wrote: > What's the status of JCROM -> Jackrabbit idea, and OCM in Jackrabbit in > general?  It's not clear from reading the website, or the lists. There seems to be general interest to bringing JCROM to Jackrabbit, and so far I see nobody obje

Re: JCROM and Jackrabbit OCM

Hi. I also has used Jcrom for a while. Not any fancy stuff, but plain basic mapping. It has problems, but I like the simplicity of the framework. Could even be simpler than it is right now. Have done some minor modifications that suites the project I used it on. I would really like to see this pro

Re: Question: Jackrabbit on Oracle - oracle indexing rather than lucene's?

On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 14:00, Alexander Klimetschek wrote: > On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 13:09, David Wagener wrote: >> But when I compare the performance of both solutions, the search module >> based on “Bundle File-System” is faster than running search module on >> “Bundle Database PM”. > > The (l

[jira] Updated: (JCR-2334) Tika-based type detection in jcr-server

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-2334?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jukka Zitting updated JCR-2334: --- Attachment: JCR-2334.patch Minor update to the patch: Fix the javadocs about the default content node t

[jira] Updated: (JCR-2334) Tika-based type detection in jcr-server

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-2334?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jukka Zitting updated JCR-2334: --- Attachment: JCR-2334.patch Proposed patch. > Tika-based type detection in jcr-server > ---

[jira] Created: (JCR-2334) Tika-based type detection in jcr-server

Tika-based type detection in jcr-server --- Key: JCR-2334 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-2334 Project: Jackrabbit Content Repository Issue Type: Improvement Components: jackrabbit

Re: Question: Jackrabbit on Oracle - oracle indexing rather than lucene's?

On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 13:09, David Wagener wrote: > But when I compare the performance of both solutions, the search module > based on “Bundle File-System” is faster than running search module on > “Bundle Database PM”. The (lucene) search index implementation is independent from the persistenc

Question: Jackrabbit on Oracle - oracle indexing rather than lucene's?

Hello, I have developed an application for searching xml-data in the repository. It works fine. Then I startet to use oracle database with using the oracle persistence manager. It works fine, too. But when I compare the performance of both solutions, the search module based on "Bundle File-S

[jira] Updated: (JCR-2333) ItemImpl#validateTransientItems: Incomplete validation of mandatory child item

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-2333?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] angela updated JCR-2333: Attachment: JCR_2333.patch patch addition the checks suggested above (and replacing some for-loops by foreach-loops)