[jira] Reopened: (JCR-2870) Transient Repository cannot be used more than once when configured with DataSources

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-2870?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Thomas Mueller reopened JCR-2870: - I believe this commit is causing a test failure: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Jackrabbit-trunk

RE: Hudson build is still unstable: Jackrabbit-trunk » Jackrabbit JCA Resource Adapter #1449

Hi, As Thomas already noted, this could be a regression from JCR-2870. I'll investigate. BR, Jukka Zitting -Original Message- From: Apache Hudson Server [mailto:hud...@hudson.apache.org] Sent: Monday, February 07, 2011 6:15 PM To: dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Subject: Hudson build is sti

[jira] Commented: (JCR-2881) Deadlock on version operations in a clustered environment

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-2881?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12991964#comment-12991964 ] John Langley commented on JCR-2881: --- I am seeing this same behavior in 2.1.3... What's the

[jira] Created: (JCR-2883) Node.orderBefore and JackrabbitNode.rename should check for ability to modify children-collection on parent node

Node.orderBefore and JackrabbitNode.rename should check for ability to modify children-collection on parent node Key: JCR-2883 URL: https://issues.apa

[jira] Created: (JCR-2884) query.setOffset() with davex protocol doesn't work

query.setOffset() with davex protocol doesn't work -- Key: JCR-2884 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-2884 Project: Jackrabbit Content Repository Issue Type: Bug Componen

[jira] Commented: (JCR-2880) Setting a binary property twice discards blob but does not remove it from changelog

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-2880?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12991967#comment-12991967 ] angela commented on JCR-2880: - > Setting a binary property twice discards the blob value of the

[jira] Resolved: (JCR-2884) query.setOffset() with davex protocol doesn't work

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-2884?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] angela resolved JCR-2884. - Resolution: Duplicate duplicate of JCR-2543 > query.setOffset() with davex protocol doesn't work > ---

[jira] Updated: (JCR-2884) query.setOffset() with davex protocol doesn't work

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-2884?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] angela updated JCR-2884: Component/s: (was: jackrabbit-webdav) jackrabbit-spi2dav > query.setOffset() with davex protocol

[jira] Commented: (JCR-2880) Setting a binary property twice discards blob but does not remove it from changelog

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-2880?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12991978#comment-12991978 ] Tobias Bocanegra commented on JCR-2880: --- from the little debugging i conducted, i thin

[jira] Commented: (JCR-2880) Setting a binary property twice discards blob but does not remove it from changelog

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-2880?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12991981#comment-12991981 ] angela commented on JCR-2880: - jcr2spi records all modifications without making any kind of clea

[jira] Commented: (JCR-2543) spi2dav : Query offset not respected

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-2543?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12991984#comment-12991984 ] Christian Stocker commented on JCR-2543: Some more info about what's the actual issu

jcr 2881 Deadlock on version operations in a clustered environment

I believe I'm seeing this in 2.1.3 as well. What's the likelihood of the fix being ported to the 2.1 branch? Thanks in advance for commenting

[jira] Commented: (JCR-2543) spi2dav : Query offset not respected

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-2543?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12992133#comment-12992133 ] Christian Stocker commented on JCR-2543: Further investigation showed me, that the r