On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 3:00 AM, Tobias Bocanegra wrote:
> nt:unstructured has orderable childnodes, and we also preach to use
> nt:unstructured whereever you can. Also, i assume that a lot of
> applications benefit from node ordering (like a CMS). So I think that
> the majority of the repositorie
I agree,
so for large childnode lists, a stable but uncontrollable order would
be ok, although violating the spec?
--
toby
On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 5:04 AM, Stefan Guggisberg
wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 3:00 AM, Tobias Bocanegra wrote:
>> nt:unstructured has orderable childnodes, and we als
