[jira] [Created] (JCR-3451) Deleting a group node directly doesn't revoke cached memberships

2012-10-23 Thread Honwai Wong (JIRA)
Honwai Wong created JCR-3451: Summary: Deleting a group node directly doesn't revoke cached memberships Key: JCR-3451 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3451 Project: Jackrabbit Content

[jira] [Resolved] (JCR-3451) Deleting a group node directly doesn't revoke cached memberships

2012-10-23 Thread angela (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3451?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] angela resolved JCR-3451. - Resolution: Invalid if you remove a user/group node directly instead of using user management API, you are in

Build failed in Jenkins: Jackrabbit-2.2 #91

2012-10-23 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
See https://builds.apache.org/job/Jackrabbit-2.2/91/changes Changes: [jukka] 2.2: Merged revision 1400935 (JCR-3447) -- [...truncated 3910 lines...] AUjackrabbit-webapp/src/main/webapp/META-INF/NOTICE AU

Roadmap for Jackrabbit 2.x and 3.0

2012-10-23 Thread Jukka Zitting
Hi, On oak-dev@ we were just discussing about the future of Oak and how it'll relate to Jackrabbit in general. The emerging consensus seems to be that we should keep Oak as a part of Jackrabbit and have Jackrabbit 3.0 be based on Oak. Here's an early draft of how this could work out in terms of

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: Jackrabbit-2.2 #91

2012-10-23 Thread Bart van der Schans
Looks like a Jenkins related failure. Can somebody restart the build? Bart On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 1:07 PM, Apache Jenkins Server jenk...@builds.apache.org wrote: See https://builds.apache.org/job/Jackrabbit-2.2/91/changes Changes: [jukka] 2.2: Merged revision 1400935 (JCR-3447)

AW: Roadmap for Jackrabbit 2.x and 3.0

2012-10-23 Thread KÖLL Claus
sounds good to me .. +1 greets claus

Build failed in Jenkins: Jackrabbit-2.2 #92

2012-10-23 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
See https://builds.apache.org/job/Jackrabbit-2.2/92/ -- [...truncated 1232 lines...] [INFO] Including generated jar file[jackrabbit-jca-2.2.14-SNAPSHOT.jar] [INFO] Copying artifact[org.apache.jackrabbit,

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: Jackrabbit-2.2 #91

2012-10-23 Thread Jukka Zitting
Hi, On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 4:31 PM, Bart van der Schans b.vandersch...@onehippo.com wrote: Looks like a Jenkins related failure. Can somebody restart the build? Done. The next build seems to have passed. BR, Jukka Zitting

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: Jackrabbit-2.2 #91

2012-10-23 Thread Jukka Zitting
Hi, On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 4:52 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote: Done. The next build seems to have passed. Oh, I was looking at the console output from a wrong build. Looks like there's something more wrong with Jenkins that's causing these builds to fail. BR, Jukka Zitting

Re: Roadmap for Jackrabbit 2.x and 3.0

2012-10-23 Thread Bart van der Schans
I like it ;-) +1 Bart On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 4:03 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, On oak-dev@ we were just discussing about the future of Oak and how it'll relate to Jackrabbit in general. The emerging consensus seems to be that we should keep Oak as a part of

Re: When moving a Tree, can it die?

2012-10-23 Thread Jukka Zitting
Hi, On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 11:40 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote: The trouble is that a parent doesn't have a direct reference to a child and can thus not tell it that it has become invalid. The only way I can think of to solve this issue is for the child to ask the parent

Re: ContentSession#createBlob ?

2012-10-23 Thread Angela Schreiber
hi michael i create an enhancement to track that issue at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-392 and i added a suggestion on how to improve that in rev. 1401331 (with TODOs for those parts that IMO need some extra care and clarification). tests passed but i didn't check if there are many