Honwai Wong created JCR-3451:
Summary: Deleting a group node directly doesn't revoke cached
memberships
Key: JCR-3451
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3451
Project: Jackrabbit Content
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3451?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
angela resolved JCR-3451.
-
Resolution: Invalid
if you remove a user/group node directly instead of using user management API,
you are in
See https://builds.apache.org/job/Jackrabbit-2.2/91/changes
Changes:
[jukka] 2.2: Merged revision 1400935 (JCR-3447)
--
[...truncated 3910 lines...]
AUjackrabbit-webapp/src/main/webapp/META-INF/NOTICE
AU
Hi,
On oak-dev@ we were just discussing about the future of Oak and how
it'll relate to Jackrabbit in general. The emerging consensus seems to
be that we should keep Oak as a part of Jackrabbit and have Jackrabbit
3.0 be based on Oak.
Here's an early draft of how this could work out in terms of
Looks like a Jenkins related failure. Can somebody restart the build?
Bart
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 1:07 PM, Apache Jenkins Server
jenk...@builds.apache.org wrote:
See https://builds.apache.org/job/Jackrabbit-2.2/91/changes
Changes:
[jukka] 2.2: Merged revision 1400935 (JCR-3447)
sounds good to me ..
+1
greets
claus
See https://builds.apache.org/job/Jackrabbit-2.2/92/
--
[...truncated 1232 lines...]
[INFO] Including generated jar file[jackrabbit-jca-2.2.14-SNAPSHOT.jar]
[INFO] Copying artifact[org.apache.jackrabbit,
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 4:31 PM, Bart van der Schans
b.vandersch...@onehippo.com wrote:
Looks like a Jenkins related failure. Can somebody restart the build?
Done. The next build seems to have passed.
BR,
Jukka Zitting
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 4:52 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Done. The next build seems to have passed.
Oh, I was looking at the console output from a wrong build. Looks like
there's something more wrong with Jenkins that's causing these builds
to fail.
BR,
Jukka Zitting
I like it ;-)
+1
Bart
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 4:03 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On oak-dev@ we were just discussing about the future of Oak and how
it'll relate to Jackrabbit in general. The emerging consensus seems to
be that we should keep Oak as a part of
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 11:40 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
The trouble is that a parent doesn't have a direct reference to a
child and can thus not tell it that it has become invalid. The only
way I can think of to solve this issue is for the child to ask the
parent
hi michael
i create an enhancement to track that issue at
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-392
and i added a suggestion on how to improve that in
rev. 1401331 (with TODOs for those parts that IMO
need some extra care and clarification). tests passed
but i didn't check if there are many
12 matches
Mail list logo