My application ( basically a product..) is configured with Siteminder policy
server and has a SM cookie.I would like to implement the HTTPClient to
connect to WebDav .
I am using the JAckRabbit 1.5.2/common-http-client 3.0.( these versions
)comes with our appilication
Using the Httpclient,
While
unsubscribe
From: Torgeir Veimo
To: dev@jackrabbit.apache.org
Sent: Friday, April 20, 2012 6:26 AM
Subject: Re: Jackrabbit 2.4.2 release plan
On 20 April 2012 19:33, Alex Parvulescu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We can start preparing for the 2.4.2 release early next we
The Apache Jenkins build system has built Jackrabbit-trunk (build #2012)
Status: Still unstable
Check console output at https://builds.apache.org/job/Jackrabbit-trunk/2012/ to
view the results.
Michael Dürig created JCR-3473:
--
Summary: Group.getDeclaredMembers() results in OOME for everyone
group and many users
Key: JCR-3473
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3473
Project: Jackrabbi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3472?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Dürig updated JCR-3472:
---
Component/s: test
> LargeResultSetTest: queries don't return anything
> ---
Hi,
It seems no one noticed this due to JCR-3472 [1]. With a tentative fix
for that issue,
org.apache.jackrabbit.core.query.lucene.LargeResultSetTest fails for me
with an OOME.
Michael
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3472
On 28.11.12 11:07, Michael Dürig wrote:
Hi,
The fo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3472?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13507419#comment-13507419
]
Michael Dürig commented on JCR-3472:
This issue also seems to be a reason why the OOME I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3472?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Dürig updated JCR-3472:
---
Attachment: JCR-3472.patch
Patch demonstrating the issue
> LargeResultSetTest: queries
Michael Dürig created JCR-3472:
--
Summary: LargeResultSetTest: queries don't return anything
Key: JCR-3472
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3472
Project: Jackrabbit Content Repository
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3452?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stefan Guggisberg updated JCR-3452:
---
Issue Type: Bug (was: Improvement)
> Modified property and child node definition are rejec
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3452?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stefan Guggisberg resolved JCR-3452.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.6
Assignee: Stefan Guggisberg
fixed in svn
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3452?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13507346#comment-13507346
]
Stefan Guggisberg commented on JCR-3452:
bq. What about the change of property defin
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 3:10 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 3:57 PM, Ard Schrijvers
> wrote:
>> Are there objections against bumping Tika from 0.8 to at least 0.9 for
>> the 2.2.x branch?
>
> Upgrading dependencies in a maintenance branch is a bit troublesome as
> the
Hi,
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 3:57 PM, Ard Schrijvers
wrote:
> Are there objections against bumping Tika from 0.8 to at least 0.9 for
> the 2.2.x branch?
Upgrading dependencies in a maintenance branch is a bit troublesome as
the risk of introducing unexpected problems is higher than with
simpler c
Are there objections against bumping Tika from 0.8 to at least 0.9 for
the 2.2.x branch? Some of our customers have been bitten by [1] which
has been solved in Tika 0.9.
Regards Ard
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-548
--
Amsterdam - Oosteinde 11, 1017 WT Amsterdam
Boston - 1 Broa
Hi all,
I found that PostgreSQL and also Derby maps the NodeId on the DB using two
long columns instead of a single binary column.
Using the consistency checker of Jackrabbit (trunk) I've found that the
queries used to iterate over the PM performs very bad and the primary key
constraints is neve
Hi,
Can somebody help us solve (or workaround) this issue:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-861
It is very old, but it prohibits us to use Jackrabbit. The NoTransaction
solution is not an option.
The Filter with a user transaction around the call, almost did it. But
cased problems with
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-861?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13507319#comment-13507319
]
Richard van Nieuwenhoven commented on JCR-861:
--
Apache Jackrabbit would solve a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3452?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13507268#comment-13507268
]
Tom Quellenberg commented on JCR-3452:
--
> the required primary node types of a child no
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3452?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stefan Guggisberg updated JCR-3452:
---
Issue Type: Improvement (was: Bug)
> Modified property and child node definition are rejec
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3452?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13507249#comment-13507249
]
Stefan Guggisberg commented on JCR-3452:
bq. Yes, that is correct. BUT, adding addit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3445?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bart van der Schans resolved JCR-3445.
--
Resolution: Fixed
> PostgreSQL error with setValidationQueryTimeout
> ---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3445?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13507241#comment-13507241
]
Bart van der Schans commented on JCR-3445:
--
Committed in trunk in r1415574 and in t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3445?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13507239#comment-13507239
]
Bart van der Schans commented on JCR-3445:
--
Thanks for testing. I'll apply the patc
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3445?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13507237#comment-13507237
]
Luca Tagliani commented on JCR-3445:
Hi Bart,
yes, the last patch works fine.
BR
Luc
25 matches
Mail list logo
