Re: Oak planning boards

Right - I fixed that. Cheers Michael On 12/11/15 16:01, "Davide Giannella" wrote: >On 11/11/2015 15:19, Michael Marth wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> In order to get a better view on planned work for Oak 1.4 I have created 2 >> Kanban boards: >> >> * Epics: >>

jackrabbit-oak build #6830: Fixed

Build Update for apache/jackrabbit-oak - Build: #6830 Status: Fixed Duration: 1639 seconds Commit: 396a7b1047f4391adb869fb983b784abf68ba70d (trunk) Author: Thomas Mueller Message: OAK-3589 Property index with declaringNodeTypes sometimes used by mistake

[jira] [Comment Edited] (JCRVLT-61) Allow AccessControllHandling be defined per filter root

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCRVLT-61?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15003745#comment-15003745 ] angela edited comment on JCRVLT-61 at 11/13/15 9:19 AM: unfortunately {{Instead of

NPE in org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.jcr.query.QueryFulltextTest

hi davide thanks for fixing the baseline issues (OAK-3628). however, i getting the following failure now. would it be possible to revert those latest changes for query-fulltext that seem to be responsible for both? or is there anything i can do other than ignoring the test? kind regards angela

[jira] [Commented] (JCRVLT-61) Allow AccessControllHandling be defined per filter root

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCRVLT-61?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15003745#comment-15003745 ] angela commented on JCRVLT-61: -- unfortunately {{Instead of telling vlt what to do, we tell it the expected

[jira] [Commented] (JCRVLT-61) Allow AccessControllHandling be defined per filter root

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCRVLT-61?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15003749#comment-15003749 ] angela commented on JCRVLT-61: -- [~tripod], yes, that looks promising. however, i have to admit that i keep

Re: NPE in org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.jcr.query.QueryFulltextTest

that's due to an error of mine in OAK-3580, now fixed. Tommaso Il giorno ven 13 nov 2015 alle ore 10:34 Angela Schreiber ha scritto: > hi davide > > thanks for fixing the baseline issues (OAK-3628). however, i getting the > following failure now. would it be possible to

jackrabbit-oak build #6842: Broken

Build Update for apache/jackrabbit-oak - Build: #6842 Status: Broken Duration: 1554 seconds Commit: 392177f05ffe1282ff3580c0e0d7d73e5a7cceee (1.2) Author: Tommaso Teofili Message: OAK-3580 - use indexes for excerpt, backport to 1.2 git-svn-id:

[jira] [Commented] (JCRVLT-61) Allow AccessControllHandling be defined per filter root

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCRVLT-61?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15004509#comment-15004509 ] Tobias Bocanegra commented on JCRVLT-61: I think relying on some ordering brings even more

[Oak origin/1.0] Apache Jackrabbit Oak matrix - Build # 546 - Failure

The Apache Jenkins build system has built Apache Jackrabbit Oak matrix (build #546) Status: Failure Check console output at https://builds.apache.org/job/Apache%20Jackrabbit%20Oak%20matrix/546/ to view the results. Changes: [reschke] OAK-3566: avoid stale documents in RDBDocumentStore cache

[jira] [Commented] (JCRVLT-61) Allow AccessControllHandling be defined per filter root

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCRVLT-61?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15003837#comment-15003837 ] Robert Munteanu commented on JCRVLT-61: --- A solution that comes into mind is to establish an absolute