BUILD FAILURE: Jackrabbit Oak - Build # 267 - Failure

The Apache Jenkins build system has built Jackrabbit Oak (build #267) Status: Failure Check console output at https://builds.apache.org/job/Jackrabbit%20Oak/267/ to view the results. Changes: [reschke] OAK-6140: Create RDB-specific BlobReferenceIterator Test results: All tests passed

Re: Oak indexes

Works like a charm, thanks Roy > On 8 May 2017, at 15:39, Vikas Saurabh wrote: > > Hi Roy, > > On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 6:52 PM, Roy Teeuwen wrote: >> Invalid directory at the location, check console for more information. Last >> Exception:

Re: Oak indexes

Hi Roy, On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 6:52 PM, Roy Teeuwen wrote: > Invalid directory at the location, check console for more information. Last > Exception: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: A SPI class of type > org.apache.lucene.codes.Codec with name 'oakCodec' does not exist.

Re: Oak indexes

Hey Tommaso, Cool thanks. I tried it out, and when using luke-4.7.0 jar I get the following exception: Invalid directory at the location, check console for more information. Last Exception: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: A SPI class of type org.apache.lucene.codes.Codec with name

Re: Oak indexes

Hi Roy, if you have copy on read enabled (it is by default) for the Oak Lucene index you should be able to take the index at their paths on the file systems and use Luke as per any other Lucene index (btw Oak is currently using Lucene 4.7.1). Hope it helps, Tommaso [1] :

Oak indexes

Hey all, I got a question relating the oak:indexes in Jackrabbit OAK. Is it possible to actually open these indexes and see what is inside them? I know it is possible to use Luke to open a Lucene index and query it manually, is this also possible for the property index and the Lucene index

BUILD FAILURE: Jackrabbit Oak - Build # 263 - Failure

The Apache Jenkins build system has built Jackrabbit Oak (build #263) Status: Failure Check console output at https://builds.apache.org/job/Jackrabbit%20Oak/263/ to view the results. Changes: [mreutegg] OAK-5898: Revision GC command line tool Log exception when the command fails [mreutegg]

Re: svn commit: r1794332 - in /jackrabbit/oak/trunk/oak-core/src: main/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/oak/plugins/document/mongo/MongoMissingLastRevSeeker.java test/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/oak/plugins/

On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 5:01 PM, wrote: > -DBObject sortFields = new > BasicDBObject(NodeDocument.MODIFIED_IN_SECS, -1); > +DBObject sortFields = new > BasicDBObject(NodeDocument.MODIFIED_IN_SECS, 1); May be we skip sorting altogether. In that case

Re: BUILD FAILURE: Jackrabbit Oak - Build # 261 - Failure

On Mon, 2017-05-08 at 13:12 +0200, Alex Parvulescu wrote: > Hi, > > This looks odd [0], builds takes 49 mins, doesn't fail, but it still > times-out at 60. > > alex > > > [0] > [INFO] BUILD SUCCESS > [INFO] > --- > - > [INFO]

Re: BUILD FAILURE: Jackrabbit Oak - Build # 261 - Failure

Hi, This looks odd [0], builds takes 49 mins, doesn't fail, but it still times-out at 60. alex [0] [INFO] BUILD SUCCESS [INFO] [INFO] Total time: 49:02 min [INFO] Finished at: 2017-05-08T10:40:03+00:00 [INFO] Final

BUILD FAILURE: Jackrabbit Oak - Build # 261 - Failure

The Apache Jenkins build system has built Jackrabbit Oak (build #261) Status: Failure Check console output at https://builds.apache.org/job/Jackrabbit%20Oak/261/ to view the results. Changes: [alexparvulescu] OAK-6145 Move MembershipWriter#setMembers() to oak-upgrade Test results: All

[jira] [Commented] (JCRVLT-155) JcrPackage.isInstalled does not return false in case the package has been overwritten

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCRVLT-155?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16000347#comment-16000347 ] Tobias Bocanegra commented on JCRVLT-155: - it should update it:

[jira] [Commented] (JCRVLT-155) JcrPackage.isInstalled does not return false in case the package has been overwritten

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCRVLT-155?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16000340#comment-16000340 ] Konrad Windszus commented on JCRVLT-155: [~tripod] Thanks a lot for applying it. I am still not