[jira] [Created] (JCR-4455) condition index-rule handling more broken after JCR-4339

2019-06-27 Thread Ate Douma (JIRA)
Ate Douma created JCR-4455: -- Summary: condition index-rule handling more broken after JCR-4339 Key: JCR-4455 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-4455 Project: Jackrabbit Content Repository

[jira] [Updated] (JCR-4455) condition index-rule handling more broken after JCR-4339

2019-06-27 Thread Ate Douma (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-4455?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ate Douma updated JCR-4455: --- Attachment: exposing-JCR-4455.patch > condition index-rule handling more broken after JCR-4339 > --

[jira] [Commented] (JCR-4455) condition index-rule handling more broken after JCR-4339

2019-06-27 Thread Ate Douma (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-4455?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16874514#comment-16874514 ] Ate Douma commented on JCR-4455: As we want to proceed with the upgrade to 2.18.2 anyhow, f

[jira] [Commented] (JCR-4455) condition index-rule handling more broken after JCR-4339

2019-07-07 Thread Ate Douma (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-4455?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16879942#comment-16879942 ] Ate Douma commented on JCR-4455: Hi [~c_koell], Yes, this now works for my use-case and wi

[jira] [Commented] (JCR-4455) condition index-rule handling more broken after JCR-4339

2019-07-09 Thread Ate Douma (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-4455?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16881062#comment-16881062 ] Ate Douma commented on JCR-4455: [~c_koell] Thanks for committing the patch! But note that

[jira] [Commented] (JCR-4455) condition index-rule handling more broken after JCR-4339

2019-07-09 Thread Ate Douma (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-4455?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16881240#comment-16881240 ] Ate Douma commented on JCR-4455: Great, thanksĀ [~c_koell]! > condition index-rule handling

[jira] [Commented] (JCR-4552) EOL Jackrabbit 2.18

2020-04-10 Thread Ate Douma (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-4552?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17080445#comment-17080445 ] Ate Douma commented on JCR-4552: How/why should 2.18 already go EOL? That doesn't make sen

[jira] [Comment Edited] (JCR-4552) EOL Jackrabbit 2.18

2020-04-10 Thread Ate Douma (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-4552?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17080445#comment-17080445 ] Ate Douma edited comment on JCR-4552 at 4/10/20, 12:07 PM: --- How/w

[jira] [Issue Comment Deleted] (JCR-4552) EOL Jackrabbit 2.18

2020-04-10 Thread Ate Douma (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-4552?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ate Douma updated JCR-4552: --- Comment: was deleted (was: How/why should 2.18 already go EOL? That doesn't make sense, v2.16 is indicated to

[jira] Commented: (JCR-804) Avoid using MultiTermDocs

2007-04-04 Thread Ate Douma (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-804?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12486667 ] Ate Douma commented on JCR-804: --- Marcel, Your solution breaks JDK 1.4 compatibility, jackrabbit-core now requires JDK 5.

[jira] Commented: (JCR-804) Avoid using MultiTermDocs

2007-04-09 Thread Ate Douma (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-804?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12487621 ] Ate Douma commented on JCR-804: --- Hi Marcel, I just want to confirm Jukka's comment: that is what I encountered with Eclip

[jira] Commented: (JCR-781) RMI: Allow custom socket factories

2007-04-16 Thread Ate Douma (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-781?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12489217 ] Ate Douma commented on JCR-781: --- Jukka, As result of this change the JCR-RMI server is no longer working for us. We now

[jira] Commented: (JCR-781) RMI: Allow custom socket factories

2007-04-16 Thread Ate Douma (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-781?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12489242 ] Ate Douma commented on JCR-781: --- To make a little more clear what seems to be the problem: The new "default" behavior of

[jira] Commented: (JCR-781) RMI: Allow custom socket factories

2007-04-16 Thread Ate Douma (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-781?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12489244 ] Ate Douma commented on JCR-781: --- Damn, I described the differences incorrectly, it should be: Implicit socket factories:

[jira] Commented: (JCR-781) RMI: Allow custom socket factories

2007-04-17 Thread Ate Douma (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-781?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12489403 ] Ate Douma commented on JCR-781: --- Thanks for the quick response. We can use the latest from the trunk again :) Regards,

[jira] [Created] (JCR-3581) Incorrect bitwise arithmetic in BitsetENTCacheImpl.BitsetKey.compareTo implementation - wrong bit mask value used

2013-04-23 Thread Ate Douma (JIRA)
Ate Douma created JCR-3581: -- Summary: Incorrect bitwise arithmetic in BitsetENTCacheImpl.BitsetKey.compareTo implementation - wrong bit mask value used Key: JCR-3581 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3581

[jira] [Updated] (JCR-3581) Incorrect bitwise arithmetic in BitsetENTCacheImpl.BitsetKey.compareTo implementation - wrong bit mask value used

2013-04-23 Thread Ate Douma (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3581?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ate Douma updated JCR-3581: --- Attachment: JCR-3581.patch The JCR-3581.patch was created against current trunk but should be applicable for m

[jira] [Commented] (JCRVLT-1) FileVault: Remove CQ/CRX/day/adobe references

2014-11-03 Thread Ate Douma (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCRVLT-1?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14194820#comment-14194820 ] Ate Douma commented on JCRVLT-1: [~tripod] Tobias, are you sure? I only see a few test class