5 jun 2024 a las 16:43, Jorge Flórez ()
escribió:
> Hi all,
> looking at some other problems in log using DEBUG level I found the
> following lines:
>
> DEBUG (async-index-update-async) [/oak:index/fileNodes] Ordered property
> defined with type STRING differs from property jcr:
Hi all,
looking at some other problems in log using DEBUG level I found the
following lines:
DEBUG (async-index-update-async) [/oak:index/fileNodes] Ordered property
defined with type STRING differs from property jcr:created =
2024-06-18T11:37:44.076-05:00 with type DATE in path /r10M6/pdfOCR4
, 9 may 2024 a las 14:22, Jorge Flórez ()
escribió:
> Hi,
>
> I don't know if this is related to the problem we are having:
>
> 2024-05-09 13:50:00,316 WARN
> [org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.index.AsyncIndexUpdate]
> (oak-scheduled-executor-3) [async] No reference checkpoint
of all my problems?
El lun, 29 abr 2024 a las 16:24, Jorge Flórez ()
escribió:
> Although it seems to process the index, it appears it does not "mark" the
> index as processed, every time I start the server, the indexing process
> starts again, very odd.
>
> El lun, 29
Although it seems to process the index, it appears it does not "mark" the
index as processed, every time I start the server, the indexing process
starts again, very odd.
El lun, 29 abr 2024 a las 10:58, Jorge Flórez ()
escribió:
> Hi all,
>
> I am having a little problem, we a
Hi all,
I am having a little problem, we are using Oak 1.52.0, packaged in a war,
that is deployed on Wildlfy 24. When I insert an index using
Node indexesParentNode = session.getNode("/oak:index");
Node indexNode =
indexesParentNode.addNode("test","oak:QueryIndexDefinition");
session.save();
you could write:
>
> if (policy instanceof JackrabbitAccessControlList)
>
> because
>
> interface JackrabbitAccessControlList extends
> JackrabbitAccessControlPolicy, AccessControlList
>
> hope that helps
> angela
>
>
>
urned. So, relying on impl details may force you to adjust your code.
>
> Hope that helps
> Angela
>
> From: Jorge Flórez
> Sent: Thursday, June 1, 2023 15:23
> To: oak-dev@jackrabbit.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Moving to Oak 1.50 or newer
>
> EXTERNAL: Use cau
ny kind of authorization model.
>
> hope that helps
> Angela
>
> From: Jorge Flórez
> Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2023 18:50
> To: oak-dev@jackrabbit.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Moving to Oak 1.50 or newer
>
> EXTERNAL: Use caution when clicking
, right?
Jorge
El mar, 23 may 2023 a las 8:24, Jorge Flórez ()
escribió:
> Hi Marcel,
> thank you for your reply. Regarding MongoDB, it looks like we are covered.
> I need to make some changes in my source code regarding the tika and
> tika-parsers version. And I got some warnings i
.
Jorge
El lun, 22 may 2023 a las 3:26, Marcel Reutegger
() escribió:
> Hi Jorge,
>
> On 16.05.23, 20:37, "Jorge Flórez" wrote:
> > we are planning to update our oak dependencies, from 1.12.0 to 1.50.0
> > (or maybe 1.52.0). We are aware that we need to use Java 11 (alrea
Hi,
we are planning to update our oak dependencies, from 1.12.0 to 1.50.0 (or
maybe 1.52.0). We are aware that we need to use Java 11 (already using it)
and update our Mongo servers. It seems it will be to version 6 (not my
decision). If I have existing repositories created and filled using
Hi all,
I am setting up an environment using oak 1.12.0 and MondoDB 6 (!). When the
repository loads, it all seems fine, but when I create a Lucene index
(persisted in file system), the Lucene files are not created and in log I
am getting
INFO
seems the correct index would be used, but as you read in my previous
> mail, *that did not happen*. Any help is appreciated.
>
> Regards.
>
> Jorge
>
> El lun, 14 nov 2022 a las 13:02, Jorge Flórez (<
> jorgeeduardoflo...@gmail.com>) escribió:
>
>> Hello,
>
u to create ticket and a PR for oak-doc?
>
> kind regards
> angela
> ________
> From: Jorge Flórez
> Sent: Monday, November 14, 2022 21:32
> To: oak-dev@jackrabbit.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Unresolved Conflict Question
>
> EXTERNAL: Use cauti
.
Jorge
El lun, 14 nov 2022 a las 13:02, Jorge Flórez ()
escribió:
> Hello,
>
> in a repository we have (very large it seems) there are two index
> definitions. Please see the image:
>
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/1KS2MZHfj1aRoWm7v6o3kbNFCPormxEft/view?usp=shari
lict-handling-with-Oak-Michael-Duerig-with-comments.pdf
Thanks.
Jorge
El mié, 5 oct 2022 a las 10:58, Jorge Flórez ()
escribió:
> Hi,
>
> in a production log I have some messages like this one:
>
> javax.jcr.InvalidItemStateException: OakState0001: Unresolved conflicts in
&
Hello,
in a repository we have (very large it seems) there are two index
definitions. Please see the image:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1KS2MZHfj1aRoWm7v6o3kbNFCPormxEft/view?usp=sharing
One index to make the depiction of a content tree faster (Index2, which
indexes nodes of type nt:folder)
tLevel(previousLevel);
queryLogger.removeAppender(customAppender);
Maybe this will help anyone with a similar need.
Regards.
Jorge
El jue, 15 sept 2022 a las 16:45, Jorge Flórez (<
jorgeeduardoflo...@gmail.com>) escribió:
> Hello all,
> I hope everybody is ok :)
> I got some production problems becaus
Hi,
in a production log I have some messages like this one:
javax.jcr.InvalidItemStateException: OakState0001: Unresolved conflicts in
/F/EDTG/2010286E/00_Hoja_Control_2017_T5.pdf
at
Hello all,
I hope everybody is ok :)
I got some production problems because of my queries (too slow, actually,
traversing nodes) and I would like to know if it is possible to know the
plan that was used, after I used the method execute for the Query object.
I think I got a situation where if the
Chetan Mehrotra
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 8:36 PM Jorge Flórez >
> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> > I am not sure if I should report this on this list, probably you already
> > know.
> > The site at http://oakutils.appspot.com/generate/index is down:
> > Er
Hi all,
I am not sure if I should report this on this list, probably you already
know.
The site at http://oakutils.appspot.com/generate/index is down:
Error: Server Error
The server encountered an error and could not complete your request.
Please try again in 30 seconds.
Thanks. Best regards.
23 matches
Mail list logo
