[jira] Created: (JCR-751) Update Jackrabbit API JavaDoc on http://jackrabbit.apache.org

Components: docs Reporter: Michael Singer Priority: Trivial Update the JavaDoc on http://jackrabbit.apache.org to the latest release version of jackrabbit. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

[jira] Created: (JCR-753) Creation of JavaDoc fails on jackrabbit-jcr-server

Reporter: Michael Singer Priority: Minor Attachments: javadoc-log.txt The creation of JavaDoc fails on project jackrabbit-jcr-server if the command mvn javadoc:javadoc is called on the latest checkout of jackrabbit. See attached log... -- This message is automatically

[jira] Updated: (JCR-753) Creation of JavaDoc fails on jackrabbit-jcr-server

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-753?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael Singer updated JCR-753: --- Attachment: javadoc-log.txt Creation of JavaDoc fails on jackrabbit-jcr-server

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit 1.2

+1 btw. I wonder if the latest changes to the clustering part are included in this release? See my last comment on JCR-623, is this issue already fixed and if yes will this fix be in v1.2? Jukka Zitting wrote: Hi, I have posted a candidate for the Apache Jackrabbit 1.2 release at

[jira] Created: (JCR-675) IIOP enabled jackrabbit-jcr-rmi, .NET 2.0 Remoting Layer Implementation, .NET 2.0 Repository Explorer implementation, .NET 2.0 implementation of JSR-170 API

Key: JCR-675 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-675 Project: Jackrabbit Issue Type: New Feature Environment: .NET Framework 2.0, JDK1.5, IIOP.NET latest version Reporter: Michael Singer

[jira] Updated: (JCR-675) IIOP enabled jackrabbit-jcr-rmi, .NET 2.0 Remoting Layer Implementation, .NET 2.0 Repository Explorer implementation, .NET 2.0 implementation of JSR-170 API

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-675?page=all ] Michael Singer updated JCR-675: --- Attachment: JCR.NET.zip The .NET 2.0 stuff... IIOP enabled jackrabbit-jcr-rmi, .NET 2.0 Remoting Layer Implementation, .NET 2.0 Repository Explorer

[jira] Updated: (JCR-675) IIOP enabled jackrabbit-jcr-rmi, .NET 2.0 Remoting Layer Implementation, .NET 2.0 Repository Explorer implementation, .NET 2.0 implementation of JSR-170 API

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-675?page=all ] Michael Singer updated JCR-675: --- Attachment: jcr-iiop.zip the IIOP enabled jackrabbit-jcr-rmi stuff... IIOP enabled jackrabbit-jcr-rmi, .NET 2.0 Remoting Layer Implementation, .NET 2.0

[jira] Commented: (JCR-675) IIOP enabled jackrabbit-jcr-rmi, .NET 2.0 Remoting Layer Implementation, .NET 2.0 Repository Explorer implementation, .NET 2.0 implementation of JSR-170 API

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-675?page=comments#action_12458424 ] Michael Singer commented on JCR-675: The file JCR.NET.zip contains 3 folders, ContentRepository, CRExplorer and JackrabbitIIOPConnector. The project

[jira] Commented: (JCR-675) IIOP enabled jackrabbit-jcr-rmi, .NET 2.0 Remoting Layer Implementation, .NET 2.0 Repository Explorer implementation, .NET 2.0 implementation of JSR-170 API

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-675?page=comments#action_12458446 ] Michael Singer commented on JCR-675: I changed the class o.a.j.r.s.ServerObject to extend PortableRemoteObject instead of UnicastRemoteObject

[jira] Commented: (JCR-623) Clustering

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-623?page=comments#action_12454688 ] Michael Singer commented on JCR-623: We did some tests with 3 clusternodes. We had problems with the following use case: JBoss-4.0.5-GA with latest JCA

Re: [jira] Commented: (JCR-623) Clustering

Hi Dominique, Dominique Pfister wrote: On 11/9/06, Pankaj Gupta (JIRA) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-623?page=comments#action_12448517 ] Pankaj Gupta commented on JCR-623: -- Thanks for geting started on this

jaas authentication

Hi all, has anybody already tried to integrate jboss jaas authentication with jackrabbit authentication? I mean authenticate once and share the security information? -- kind regards Michael