Just curious, but would have to be Version.LUCENE_36 instead of
Version.LUCENE_24, would not?
I am digging in search the "why" my phrase search is not working as it
should, since no one in these lists could helped me so far |-( ... and the
debug stopped by these lines and, although is not related
Hi,
There is a NPE problem in jack 2.10 .
in line
at
org.apache.jackrabbit.core.query.lucene.NodeIndexer.isSupportedMediaType(NodeIndexer.java:934)
supportedMediaTypes = parser.getSupportedTypes(null);
would be
supportedMediaTypes = parser.getSupportedTypes(new ParseContext());
--
That is:
I have a case where it should be monitored when updating the value of a
property occur in nodes of a certain type.
Nowadays the event listener is triggered in any update in nodes of that
type. I wonder if would be possible to configure to just trigger when
updating certain property.
I wonder if would possible to set an filter directly to a node property if
modified.
Cheers
Helio
--
View this message in context:
http://jackrabbit.510166.n4.nabble.com/Adding-further-filtering-capabilities-to-JackrabbitEventFilter-tp4661094p4661130.html
Sent from the Jackrabbit - Dev mailing
Jukka;
In my code, after upgrade to 2.8.0, it is highlighted
The type org.apache.jackrabbit.core.config.ConfigurationException cannot be
resolved. It is indirectly referenced from required .class files
in
RepositoryConfig.create(x,y)
It seems the .class ConfigurationException disappeared
About the release notes, where is it?
Regards
Helio.
--
View this message in context:
http://jackrabbit.510166.n4.nabble.com/RESULT-VOTE-Release-Apache-Jackrabbit-2-6-5-tp465p4660060.html
Sent from the Jackrabbit - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Could you maybe consider applying the patch from JCR-584 for 1.1.1?
Tks
Helio
Hi all;
Please another time I get back here to your help.
I am using jackrabbit in a solution of content manager, ok.
It's happening some errors on the log of jboss that are hardly for us to detect
the cause.
The repository suddenly gets to shutdows (as you will see in the log) without a
request
Hi;
Another doubt I bet you could help me again.
I am afraid that the size of the database will grow very fast for us. How could
I do to put compact the binaries contents in the jcr:content (nt:resource,
jcr:data) and do the indexes keeping doing like it already does for documents?
Some ideas?
Hello;
How could I know whose nodes existing in the repository without a certain kind
of mix assigned to it?
(in sql and xpath, please).
Thanks.
Helio.
Tobias, I'm Glad by your answer.
I would to complete this question with the following:
If I mix a node with mymix:example, and when I search by mymix:example, would
I get the node I have mixed with?
Thanks
Helio
Hi;
If this question was already answered, my apologies, but I don't find such
answer and need to know if Jackrabbit is ready for multiple inheritance.
For instance, if I have declared the following structure of node types:
nt:base
|
node:base
hsp wrote:
session.getWorkspace().getObservationManager().addEventListener(
ListenerNodeAddEscribaBase.getInstance(),
Event.NODE_ADDED,
/,
true,
null,
new String[] {nt:base},
false
those that are
with the atribute onParentVersion=COMPUTE ???
Its very important for me, thanks.
Hsp
Hi;
I am doing a search in sql with the following:
SELECT * FROM my:base WHERE jcr:path LIKE '/Folder1/%' +
AND NOT jcr:path LIKE '/Folder1/%/%'
And the result will be only the nodes under the Folder1 but not their subnodes,
OK, it works.
But if I put the following:
SELECT * FROM my:base
hsp wrote:
What could be the warning message about LazyReader? Even after
rebuild the indexes, I just find only one .doc file, that is the file
I put separated (it is the same that is inside the zip file with the
same properties inside a nt:resouce node).
It seems that the underlying text
hsp wrote:
Normally I put the file inside a node (nt:resource) that is inside a
nt:folder, and do the query:
SELECT * FROM nt:folder WHERE CONTAINS(*,'TEXTSEARCHINGFOR')
this will do a fulltext search on nt:folder nodes but not on the resources
that are under those nodes, therefore
on the information in the jcr:mimetype to build the
index, no?
Is there no way to rebuild the indexes without have to restart the jboss?
I am not seeing this funcionallity works, but I need it working, what are the
best pratice for that (if it exists).
Thanks
Helio
hsp wrote:
I don't mind what
I don't mind what could be happen, but my application doesn't search any values
(properties or binary contents). If I do the simple query in XPath:
//*[jcr:contains(.,'lidando')]
or the other:
//*[jcr:like(@jcr:primaryType,'%nt:folder%')]
there is no result in both, but there is node with the
Hi all;
We are building a security module for jackrabbit implementing an AccessManager
interface.
I realized that when I ask to jackrabbit like node.remove() there are several
calls to the AccesManager by the permission 1 (read) on nodes tree above the
node I want to remove.
The interesting
In the following xml definition:
nodeType name=xxx:base isMixin=false hasOrderableChildNodes=false
primaryItemName=
supertypes
supertypent:hierarchyNode/supertype
/supertypes
propertyDefinition name=prop:creator requiredType=Reference
autoCreated=false
So, the place for the blob files must be, or only can be, in the same tree of
jboss files where is the Repository Server. About the db, ok, it can be on
another independent machine.
The only issue I think in store blob outside the db is referente to backup
methods. The blob in filesystem is
Extending this thread, while have anyone to opine it.
I know that only the content (properties and binary under nt:resource) are
automatically indexed by jackrabbit for searches, and of course these contents
must have be in the repository for the method get works...
I would to know if its
That is a question I want to do too.
Anyway, following your example, when I want to give access to a node with
id=XXX to an user USER, I must create a new propertie, called XXX into the node
the USER belongs to, for ex:
USER (nodetype my:user (nt:folder))
prop1:value1 (property defined in
of another machines.
But, if there is the possibility to make a repository with only one workspace
for different applications use, I think it is so less complex, then I'll
re-think about it.
It's so confusing for me understang such configuration, sorry.
Thanks by your help
Helio
Hi hsp!
I want
a begginer.
Thanks
Helio
On Tue, 2006-04-04 at 10:07 -0300, hsp wrote:
Anyway, following your example, when I want to give access to a node
with id=XXX to an user USER, I must create a new propertie, called XXX
into the node the USER belongs to, for ex:
On Tue, 2006-04-04 at 10:26 +0200
Let's supose I need to store in a useraccess propertie of myapp:user node type
two values: itemId and kindRight (concatenated..., maybe).
Will I get success using the propertie associating it with mixin (multiple
values)?
So the user Node Helio, has the propertie useraccess with the values:
27 matches
Mail list logo