[jira] [Commented] (JCRVLT-61) Allow AccessControllHandling be defined per filter root

2016-01-08 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCRVLT-61?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15089037#comment-15089037 ] Bertrand Delacretaz commented on JCRVLT-61: --- FWIW I'm working on something similar in SLING-5355.

[jira] [Commented] (JCRVLT-61) Allow AccessControllHandling be defined per filter root

2015-11-13 Thread angela (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCRVLT-61?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15003745#comment-15003745 ] angela commented on JCRVLT-61: -- unfortunately {{Instead of telling vlt what to do, we tell it the expected

[jira] [Commented] (JCRVLT-61) Allow AccessControllHandling be defined per filter root

2015-11-13 Thread angela (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCRVLT-61?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15003749#comment-15003749 ] angela commented on JCRVLT-61: -- [~tripod], yes, that looks promising. however, i have to admit that i keep

[jira] [Commented] (JCRVLT-61) Allow AccessControllHandling be defined per filter root

2015-11-13 Thread Tobias Bocanegra (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCRVLT-61?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15004509#comment-15004509 ] Tobias Bocanegra commented on JCRVLT-61: I think relying on some ordering brings even more

[jira] [Commented] (JCRVLT-61) Allow AccessControllHandling be defined per filter root

2015-11-13 Thread Robert Munteanu (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCRVLT-61?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15003837#comment-15003837 ] Robert Munteanu commented on JCRVLT-61: --- A solution that comes into mind is to establish an absolute

[jira] [Commented] (JCRVLT-61) Allow AccessControllHandling be defined per filter root

2015-11-12 Thread Robert Munteanu (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCRVLT-61?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15003355#comment-15003355 ] Robert Munteanu commented on JCRVLT-61: --- As far as declarative syntax goes, I prefer what puppet does

[jira] [Commented] (JCRVLT-61) Allow AccessControllHandling be defined per filter root

2015-11-12 Thread Tobias Bocanegra (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCRVLT-61?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15003453#comment-15003453 ] Tobias Bocanegra commented on JCRVLT-61: of course it is better to rely on existing syntax if

[jira] [Commented] (JCRVLT-61) Allow AccessControllHandling be defined per filter root

2015-11-11 Thread Tobias Bocanegra (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCRVLT-61?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15000812#comment-15000812 ] Tobias Bocanegra commented on JCRVLT-61: define _on a per entry level_ ? do you mean you want to

[jira] [Commented] (JCRVLT-61) Allow AccessControllHandling be defined per filter root

2015-11-11 Thread Alexandre COLLIGNON (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCRVLT-61?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15000517#comment-15000517 ] Alexandre COLLIGNON commented on JCRVLT-61: --- Hi [~tripod], We're currently evaluating the