[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCRVLT-603?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Konrad Windszus updated JCRVLT-603:
-----------------------------------
Description: Currently all classes in package
https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-filevault/tree/master/vault-core/src/main/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/vault/fs/spi
don't have an explicit annotation which makes them a {{ConsumerType}}
according to
https://docs.osgi.org/javadoc/osgi.annotation/7.0.0/org/osgi/annotation/versioning/ConsumerType.html.
Instead they should have the {{ProviderType}} annotation to make sure that
backward-incompatible increments don't break consumers. (was: Currently all
classes don't have an explicit annotation which makes them a {{ConsumerType}}
according to
https://docs.osgi.org/javadoc/osgi.annotation/7.0.0/org/osgi/annotation/versioning/ConsumerType.html.
Instead they should have the {{ProviderType}} annotation to make sure that
backward-incompatible increments don't break consumers.)
> Mark all classes in package 'o.a.j.vault.fs.spi' as ProviderType
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JCRVLT-603
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCRVLT-603
> Project: Jackrabbit FileVault
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Konrad Windszus
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 3.5.10
>
>
> Currently all classes in package
> https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-filevault/tree/master/vault-core/src/main/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/vault/fs/spi
> don't have an explicit annotation which makes them a {{ConsumerType}}
> according to
> https://docs.osgi.org/javadoc/osgi.annotation/7.0.0/org/osgi/annotation/versioning/ConsumerType.html.
> Instead they should have the {{ProviderType}} annotation to make sure that
> backward-incompatible increments don't break consumers.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)
