[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1760?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12638971#action_12638971
 ] 

Boni Gopalan commented on JCR-1760:
-----------------------------------

I feel JPA compliance is the right direction and is an useful extension.  The 
hard work is already done through the OCM layer.  We need to evaluate whether 
an EntityManager using OCM to expose JCR is the right approach.  Incidently on 
yesterday's lazy sunay afternoon I started writing a Jpa4Jcr API layer.  My 
strategy is to use OCM as the first cut implementation and then evaluate the 
performance.  As you have rightly pointed out Query mapping is going to be the 
most crucial aspect.  

> Review the OCM API and annotations to be more compliant with JPA
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: JCR-1760
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1760
>             Project: Jackrabbit
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: jackrabbit-ocm
>    Affects Versions: 1.5
>            Reporter: Christophe Lombart
>
> It should be possible to start smoothly the JPA support. Of course, all JPA 
> features are not necessary in the JCR world. For example, the annotations 
> @Table and @Column are not very useful for OCM :-). Nevertheless, using 
> almost the same API and a subset of the JPA annotations could be a great help 
> for people who knows the JPA specification. 
> Here is a list of changes that we can do quickly : 
> - Rename the ObjecContentManager into EntityManager and review some method 
> names. 
> - Rename the OCM annotations : 
> @Node => @Entity 
> @Field => @Basic
> @Bean => @OneToOne
> @Collection => @OneToMany. Furthermore, @Collection is not a good name 
> because it also supporting Maps :-) 
> I would like to wait for the JPA query because the upcoming JPA spec will add 
> more flexibility in this area. 
> After, we can review in more details the JPA specification and see if there 
> is a real interest to be more conform to this specification.  
> What do you think about that ? Please, add your comments. thanks 

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to