[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-529?page=comments#action_12459648 ]
Tobias Bocanegra commented on JCR-529:
--
fixed tests.
> New versions added after a restore have bad version name
> ---
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-529?page=comments#action_12458927 ]
Paco Avila commented on JCR-529:
Yes, I think you are rigth.
> New versions added after a restore have bad version name
>
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-529?page=comments#action_12458917 ]
Tobias Bocanegra commented on JCR-529:
--
well, the above ascii art did not really work in jira :-( will attach a file.
> New versions added after a restore have
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-529?page=comments#action_12458913 ]
Tobias Bocanegra commented on JCR-529:
--
imo, this should be the indented behaviour:
1.0
|
1.1
|
1.2
| \ \
1.3 1.2.0 1.2.0.0
| |
1.4 1.2
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-529?page=comments#action_12458580 ]
Paco Avila commented on JCR-529:
>From my point of view the test should check:
check(v1_3, phase, "1.0.1", 0);
And not:
check(v1_3, phase, "1.1.1", 0);
> New versi
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-529?page=comments#action_12458415 ]
Przemo Pakulski commented on JCR-529:
-
It seems that after applying patch test
org.apache.jackrabbit.core.XATest.#testXAVersionsThoroughly fails.
junit.framework
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-529?page=comments#action_12451123 ]
Paco Avila commented on JCR-529:
I am the only affected by this issue? :(
> New versions added after a restore have bad version name
> ---
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-529?page=comments#action_12425266 ]
Paco Avila commented on JCR-529:
Yes, I updated Jackarbbit source code yesterday. There is a test case attached
if you wan't to test it.
> New versions added after a
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-529?page=comments#action_12425232 ]
Tobias Bocanegra commented on JCR-529:
--
i vaguely remeber a similar bugwhat version of jackrabbit are you using?
the recent checkout?
> New versions added a
