This comparator seems odd to me, as it never returns (d) but perhaps i'm
confused, is it ok?
org.apache.jackrabbit.core.query.lucene.sort.ValueComparableWrapper
public int compareTo(ValueComparableWrapper o) {
final int d = compare(v, o.getValue());
if (d != 0) {
if
This comparator seems odd to me, as it never returns (d) but perhaps i'm
confused, is it ok?
org.apache.jackrabbit.core.query.lucene.sort.ValueComparableWrapper
public int compareTo(ValueComparableWrapper o) {
final int d = compare(v, o.getValue());
if (d != 0) {
if
On 2011-10-08 05:48, Dave Brosius wrote:
This comparator seems odd to me, as it never returns (d) but perhaps i'm
confused, is it ok?
org.apache.jackrabbit.core.query.lucene.sort.ValueComparableWrapper
public int compareTo(ValueComparableWrapper o) {
final int d = compare(v, o.getValue());
if (
On 2011-10-08 09:48, Julian Reschke wrote:
On 2011-10-08 05:48, Dave Brosius wrote:
This comparator seems odd to me, as it never returns (d) but perhaps i'm
confused, is it ok?
org.apache.jackrabbit.core.query.lucene.sort.ValueComparableWrapper
public int compareTo(ValueComparableWrapper o) {
Hi guys,
excuse the delay.
The code you are talking about is most probably my copy/paste error :)
I'll update the compareTo method.
the code is still experimental (that explains why there are no tests yet for
it).
this feature is enabled via a system property (so we can test the
performance of t
On 2011-10-10 16:01, Alex Parvulescu wrote:
Hi guys,
excuse the delay.
The code you are talking about is most probably my copy/paste error :)
I'll update the compareTo method.
the code is still experimental (that explains why there are no tests yet
for it).
this feature is enabled via a system
