Re: FileVault: Require Java 8

Hi, With https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-filevault/pull/67 I upgraded the Oak dependency to 1.18 (from 1.16) for FileVault 3.4.x. With which AEM version should FileVault be compatible? AEM 6.4 comes with Oak 1.8.13 and AEM 6.5 with

Re: FileVault: Require Java 8

As long as it is not embedded that shouldn't be any problem. But it is very hard to ensure backwards compatibility that way, because currently there is no IT testing FileVault with Java 7 and Jackrabbit 2.14. Konrad > On 5. Sep 2019, at 09:43, Julian Reschke wrote: > > On 05.09.2019 03:18,

Re: FileVault: Require Java 8

On 05.09.2019 03:18, Tobias Bocanegra wrote: Hi, ok. So from the jackrabbit / oak side we have: - Jackrabbit 2.18 - recommended version for Java 8 and newer - Jackrabbit 2.16 - Java 8 and newer - Jackrabbit 2.14 - recommended version for Java 7 - “end of life” planned for Spring 2022 -

Re: FileVault: Require Java 8

Hi, ok. So from the jackrabbit / oak side we have: - Jackrabbit 2.18 - recommended version for Java 8 and newer - Jackrabbit 2.16 - Java 8 and newer - Jackrabbit 2.14 - recommended version for Java 7 - “end of life” planned for Spring 2022 - Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.16.0 (Java 8 and later) -

Re: FileVault: Require Java 8

I am a bit confused, Jackrabbit 2.16 requires Java 8 already and was already required with filevault 3.2.8 (https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-filevault/blob/5104a49b4b0fcd25bfbcc202734cca490e55765d/parent/pom.xml#L43) Oak 1.6 on the other hand still supports Java 7 (it depends on Jackrabbit

Re: FileVault: Require Java 8

Hi, The problem is, that we need oak 1.6 / jackrabbit 2.16 compatible version of filevault. I think that https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCRVLT-340 might already changed that. If so, we need to update The major version and jump to 4.0.0, if filevault no longer works with oak 1.16. And