Hey Fabrizio,
Great, thanks !
-g
On 10 Feb 2011, at 21:09, Fabrizio Giustina wrote:
> Hi,
> I found out the solution by myself some time after my question: yes,
> there is already a better replacement, which is the standard bundle
> filesytem persistence manager.
>
> There is a way to set it u
Hi,
I found out the solution by myself some time after my question: yes,
there is already a better replacement, which is the standard bundle
filesytem persistence manager.
There is a way to set it up using a memory filesystem... looks like
it's not really well documented, but after some digging in
Hi guys,
Same question as Fabrizio below - is there an alternative, or any plan to have
a non-deprecated InMemPersistenceManager ?
(As long as it works, I shouldn't care much about the deprecatedness, but it's
just clogging the logs, so I'd rather be sure I can really shunt those logs
down duri
Hi,
after the deprecation of non-bundle persistence managers in 2.2 also
the memory-only implementation
(org.apache.jackrabbit.core.persistence.mem.InMemPersistenceManager)
has been deprecated and its usage generates leads to a few warnings in
the log.
I am currently using the in-memory pm mainly
