Stefan Guggisberg wrote:
we just discovered, that the "orderable" attribute of node types is not
inherited from supertypes. NodeTypeImpl.hasOrderableChildNodes() just calls
NodeTypeDef.hasOrderableChildNodes() instead of using the EffectiveNodeType to
determine if a node type allows orderable ch
hi christoph
On 7/31/07, Christoph Kiehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we just discovered, that the "orderable" attribute of node types is not
> inherited from supertypes. NodeTypeImpl.hasOrderableChildNodes() just calls
> NodeTypeDef.hasOrderableChildNodes() instead of using the EffectiveN
Hi,
we just discovered, that the "orderable" attribute of node types is not
inherited from supertypes. NodeTypeImpl.hasOrderableChildNodes() just calls
NodeTypeDef.hasOrderableChildNodes() instead of using the EffectiveNodeType to
determine if a node type allows orderable child nodes.
The spec