hi guys,
i tried to update the document sizes to be more meaningful...
http://www.day.com/specs/jcr/2.0/
(possibly hit reload in your browser in case you may still have stuff
in your cache)
feedback still very welcome ;)
regards,
david
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 3:13 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz
Hi David
Looks pretty good to me. Some minor issues/suggestions:
* The footer is rendered at the top on the start page (intentionally?)
* It would be nice if all references (e.g. see §3.7.1.2 Supertypes) were links.
* In section 8.6.1.3 Root Declaring Node Type some method signatures
are linked
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 18:07, David Nuescheler david.nuesche...@day.com wrote:
i tried to update the document sizes to be more meaningful...
Yes, these doc sizes are much better, especially the toc is now easily
scannable with one look and no scrolling.
feedback still very welcome ;)
The
Hi all,
please find a draft of the JSR 283 html version online.
http://www.day.com/specs/jcr/2.0/
this should mostly facilitate referring to parts of the
specification. This is a draft that was generated mostly
automatically so I expect a lot of clean-up work, please let
me know if you run into
Hi,
This mini ravioli style is not very usable. I would create 25 pages
(1 Preface, 2 Introduction, 3 Repository Model, ..., 25 Appendix),
each page with a TOC of its own. As in Wikipedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XHTML - this is no longer a problem for
Google:
Hi David,
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 2:59 PM, David Nuescheler da...@day.com wrote:
please find a draft of the JSR 283 html version online.
http://www.day.com/specs/jcr/2.0/
Cool
...After looking into the split-up I am tempted to created fewer
bigger documents instead
Yes...pages like
