Re: Jackrabbit and JDK versions

2016-09-27 Thread Julian Reschke
On 2016-09-27 09:03, Amit Jain wrote: Hi, My preference is also 2. Since, Oak 1.2 uses JR 2.12 and needs compatibility with JDK 6, we should leave 2.12 at JDK 6. Thanks Amit Good point. That IMHO settles the question. Best regards, Julian

Re: Jackrabbit and JDK versions

2016-09-27 Thread Amit Jain
Hi, My preference is also 2. Since, Oak 1.2 uses JR 2.12 and needs compatibility with JDK 6, we should leave 2.12 at JDK 6. Thanks Amit On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 12:28 PM, Julian Reschke wrote: > On 2016-09-22 13:10, Davide Giannella wrote: > >> On 21/09/2016 14:45, Julian Reschke wrote: >> >>>

Re: Jackrabbit and JDK versions

2016-09-26 Thread Julian Reschke
On 2016-09-22 13:10, Davide Giannella wrote: On 21/09/2016 14:45, Julian Reschke wrote: 3) Switch trunk and 2.12 to JDK 7. +1 Davide Little feedback so far. I assume silence is approval :-) I opened to track the change for trunk; we can make

Re: Jackrabbit and JDK versions

2016-09-22 Thread Davide Giannella
On 21/09/2016 14:45, Julian Reschke wrote: > 3) Switch trunk and 2.12 to JDK 7. +1 Davide

Jackrabbit and JDK versions

2016-09-21 Thread Julian Reschke
Hi there, with the recent work around JCR-4025 we have enabled the animal sniffer plugin for trunk, 2.12, 2.10, 2.8, 2.6 (all JDK 6) and 2.4 (JDK 5). Which leaves us with the question whether we should allow use of JDK 7 in trunk (mapping to Oak trunk which is on JDK 7) and maybe 2.12 (which