Litmus setup to run against jackrabbit

2006-08-15 Thread David Kennedy
I'm trying to run litmus against my jackrabbit webdav install, but am getting a Forbidden response when the litmus begin test attempts to run delete and/or mkcol for 'litmus'. Is there something I need to change about the litmus tests to run them against jackrabbit? David

Re: Litmus setup to run against jackrabbit

2006-08-15 Thread Angela Schreiber
David Kennedy wrote: I'm trying to run litmus against my jackrabbit webdav install, but am getting a Forbidden response when the litmus begin test attempts to run delete and/or mkcol for 'litmus'. Is there something I need to change about the litmus tests to run them against jackrabbit? you

Re: Litmus setup to run against jackrabbit

2006-08-15 Thread David Kennedy
Angela Schreiber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 08/15/2006 09:37:19 AM: > David Kennedy wrote: > > I'm trying to run litmus against my jackrabbit webdav install, but am > > getting a Forbidden response when the litmus begin test attempts to run > > delete and/or mkcol for 'litmus'. Is there some

Re: Litmus setup to run against jackrabbit

2006-08-15 Thread Angela Schreiber
David Kennedy wrote: I'm running JCRWebdavServerServlet (not the simple server). hm. this doesn't make sense from my point of view. litmus expects that a MKCOL can be performed without request body, that a simple file can be created and modified and last but not least that any kind of propert

Re: Litmus setup to run against jackrabbit

2006-08-15 Thread David Kennedy
Angela Schreiber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 08/15/2006 10:21:46 AM: > David Kennedy wrote: > > > I'm running JCRWebdavServerServlet (not the simple server). > > hm. this doesn't make sense from my point of view. > I guess you're saying it doesn't make sense that I'd be running litmus agains

Re: Litmus setup to run against jackrabbit

2006-08-15 Thread Angela Schreiber
David Kennedy wrote: When you responded previously that the testcases you used to drive the webdav server were the litmus tests, I'd assumed that the same tests could be used against either servlet. ah? so you didn't read my follow-up remark? http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@jackrabbit.apa