Re: September board report

2015-09-09 Thread Davide Giannella
On 08/09/2015 15:40, Robert Munteanu wrote: > > It's not just for Oak - I get it for Sling releases. AFAIR it's > triggered by commits to dist.apache.org . > Does anyone know if we could hook any custom script in the commit? By the structure we have under dist it would be very easy looking at the

Re: September board report

2015-09-08 Thread Michael Dürig
oak 1.0.19 is missing, and so are oak 1.2.3 and 1.2.4... Thanks Julian for spotting, added those. I'm using https://reporter.apache.org/?jackrabbit to generate the skeleton for the report. Apparently the tooling is not as good as it should - like always ;-) Michael

Re: September board report

2015-09-08 Thread Michael Dürig
On 8.9.15 10:00 , Davide Giannella wrote: On 08/09/2015 09:02, Michael Dürig wrote: oak 1.0.19 is missing, and so are oak 1.2.3 and 1.2.4... Thanks Julian for spotting, added those. I'm using https://reporter.apache.org/?jackrabbit to generate the skeleton for the report. Apparently the

Re: September board report

2015-09-08 Thread Davide Giannella
On 08/09/2015 09:02, Michael Dürig wrote: >> >> oak 1.0.19 is missing, and so are oak 1.2.3 and 1.2.4... > > Thanks Julian for spotting, added those. I'm using > https://reporter.apache.org/?jackrabbit to generate the skeleton for > the report. Apparently the tooling is not as good as it should -

Re: September board report

2015-09-08 Thread Davide Giannella
On 08/09/2015 10:06, Michael Dürig wrote: > Uh I didn't know that. I thought the tool would fetch that information > on demand from JIRA (as it is indicating actually). Why would it need > it's own DB in the first place? This sounds like asking for trouble. > Not sure what could be done on our

Re: September board report

2015-09-08 Thread Robert Munteanu
On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 4:27 PM, Davide Giannella wrote: > On 08/09/2015 10:06, Michael Dürig wrote: >> Uh I didn't know that. I thought the tool would fetch that information >> on demand from JIRA (as it is indicating actually). Why would it need >> it's own DB in the first

Re: September board report

2015-09-07 Thread Julian Reschke
On 2015-09-07 10:46, Michael Dürig wrote: Hi, I've assembled a preliminary board report for September: https://wiki.apache.org/jackrabbit/Board Report September 2015 Let me know if there is anything missing or broken. I plan to submit it Wednesday morning CET. ... LGTM, except for the

RE: September Board Report

2013-09-09 Thread Marcel Reutegger
Hi, just one minor correction: the 2.6.3 release was done from the 2.6 branch and not from trunk. regards marcel -Original Message- From: Michael Dürig [mailto:mdue...@apache.org] Sent: Montag, 9. September 2013 10:46 To: dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Subject: September Board Report

Re: September Board Report

2013-09-09 Thread Michael Dürig
On 9.9.13 12:01 , Marcel Reutegger wrote: just one minor correction: the 2.6.3 release was done from the 2.6 branch and not from trunk. Thanks for spotting, fixed. Michael

Re: September board report

2012-09-04 Thread Ard Schrijvers
Hello Michael, On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 3:07 PM, Michael Dürig mdue...@apache.org wrote: Hi, I've assembled a preliminary board report for September: http://wiki.apache.org/jackrabbit/Board%20Report%20September%202012 One thing that needs further clarification is the state of the OCM 2.0.0

Re: September board report

2012-09-04 Thread Michael Dürig
On 4.9.12 14:23, Ard Schrijvers wrote: Hello Michael, On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 3:07 PM, Michael Dürig mdue...@apache.org wrote: Hi, I've assembled a preliminary board report for September: http://wiki.apache.org/jackrabbit/Board%20Report%20September%202012 One thing that needs further

Re: September board report

2012-09-04 Thread Ard Schrijvers
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 3:46 PM, Michael Dürig mdue...@apache.org wrote: On 4.9.12 14:23, Ard Schrijvers wrote: I am working on it right away (and as mentioned, sry about forgetting, that is sloppy of me). I hope you can give me a pointer where you'd like to have the release notes for OCM

Re: September board report

2012-09-04 Thread Ard Schrijvers
FYI : I've updated the wiki and added the RELEASE NOTES to http://archive.apache.org/dist/jackrabbit/ocm/2.0.0/ After the website and the release notes are synced (they are now on /www/www.apache.org/dist/jackrabbit/ocm/2.0.0 so I think they can be synced any time) I'll send out the announcement

Re: September board report

2012-09-04 Thread Michael Dürig
On 4.9.12 15:38, Ard Schrijvers wrote: FYI : I've updated the wiki and added the RELEASE NOTES to http://archive.apache.org/dist/jackrabbit/ocm/2.0.0/ After the website and the release notes are synced (they are now on /www/www.apache.org/dist/jackrabbit/ocm/2.0.0 so I think they can be

Re: September board report

2012-09-04 Thread Ard Schrijvers
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 5:44 PM, Michael Dürig mdue...@apache.org wrote: On 4.9.12 15:38, Ard Schrijvers wrote: FYI : I've updated the wiki and added the RELEASE NOTES to http://archive.apache.org/dist/jackrabbit/ocm/2.0.0/ After the website and the release notes are synced (they are now on