On 8/9/06, Lars Heuer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Robert,
[...]
one of the main reasons why i want to use webDAV is that it's RESTful.
IMAP and POP3 both suck for the problems i'm interested in because
they are not.
Yes. But I just want to create a RESTful 'view' at IMAP / POP3.
Nothing to
Hi Robert,
[...]
one of the main reasons why i want to use webDAV is that it's RESTful.
IMAP and POP3 both suck for the problems i'm interested in because
they are not.
Yes. But I just want to create a RESTful 'view' at IMAP / POP3.
Nothing to edit / change, only view. :) I think that is
Hi Robert,
[...]
Additionally I am interested in a good XML format for msgs.
[...]
i suspect that the hardest part of the problem will be defining
exactly that good means in this context. any initial thoughts?
We've collected some resources here:
On 8/7/06, Lars Heuer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Robert,
[...]
Additionally I am interested in a good XML format for msgs.
[...]
i suspect that the hardest part of the problem will be defining
exactly that good means in this context. any initial thoughts?
We've collected some resources
On 8/4/06, Lars Heuer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Robert,
[...]
are you interested in email webDAV too?
Sure. :)
Additionally I am interested in a good XML format for msgs.
i suspect that this may be a interesting for MIME messages :-)
javamail may be one place to start (think about xml
Hi Robert,
[...]
are you interested in email webDAV too?
Sure. :)
Additionally I am interested in a good XML format for msgs.
Well, I want to use Restlet (http://www.restlet.org/) and connect it
to a 'normal' POP3 / IMAP4 account a provide a restful view on it.
My approach is a bit different
On 8/3/06, Lars Heuer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Robert,
hi lars
[...]
There has been discussion about generalizing the WebDAV implementation
in Jackrabbit. Some parts are already quite general, i.e. the
Jackrabbit WebDAV server already provides two alternate (file- and
item-based)
On 7/14/06, Jukka Zitting [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
On 7/13/06, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the folder metaphor is widely used today. most clients use it extensively.
many mailing list archives are also organised in hierachical fashion. so,
integrating with existing
Hi,
On 7/13/06, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the folder metaphor is widely used today. most clients use it extensively.
many mailing list archives are also organised in hierachical fashion. so,
integrating with existing email clients means supporting a hierarchy.
You're
On 7/12/06, Jukka Zitting [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
hi
On 7/12/06, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
it strikes me that it's more natural to store emails plus meta-data in a
content
repository such as jackrabbit rather than in a classic RDBMS.
[...]
1 is jackrabbit
10 matches
Mail list logo