Jukka Zitting wrote:
Excellent! It would be nice to have JCR-18 and related issues as fixed
in Jackrabbit 1.4. The beer is on me if you make that happen. :-)
there's only one thing I can say:
http://www.streettech.com/storypics/simpsonbeer.wav
regards
marcel
Hi,
On 6/25/07, Marcel Reutegger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jukka Zitting wrote:
> What's the general feeling about concurrent versioning? Do we have
> light at the end of the tunnel? I guess reviewing whether JCR-18 is
> still relevant would make sense
I'm currently working on issue JCR-962 an
Jukka Zitting wrote:
What's the general feeling about concurrent versioning? Do we have
light at the end of the tunnel? I guess reviewing whether JCR-18 is
still relevant would make sense
I'm currently working on issue JCR-962 and I think I can see the light ;) though
I'm still stumbling over
Hi,
[Taking the thread to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 6/25/07, Marcel Reutegger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Pablo Rios wrote:
> Regarding the steps below required to support concurrent writes, what
> considerations should be taken into account in connection with JCR-18 issue ?
IMO JCR-18 should be clo
