Hi,
I'm probably not the only one who feels that the current Jackrabbit
web site is crappy and in serious need of improvement. Unfortunately
at least I feel that the current Maven-based web site update procedure
is rather complex and clumsy.
I hear a number of Apache projects have had good experi
+1. I would like to add the OCM doc somewhere and I agree with you that
current solution is not perfect.
I never used Confluence but it should be nice if the Jackrabbit users can
patch the doc. I mean we should configure to doc platform to maximize the
doc contributions.
br,
Christophe
On 9/13/0
Hi,
+1
As an example let me just mention Apache Felix, which is autoexported
from Confluence and introduces its own CSS and thus look and feel at the
same time.
Regards
Felix
Am Donnerstag, den 13.09.2007, 14:02 +0300 schrieb Jukka Zitting:
> Hi,
>
> I'm probably not the only one who feels tha
Jukka Zitting wrote:
I hear a number of Apache projects have had good experience on using a
Confluence wiki as a kind of a CMS for editing their web sites. How
would you feel if we took the same approach in Jackrabbit? Write
access to the web site wiki would still be limited to committers.
I k
Hi,
On 9/13/07, Jukka Zitting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I hear a number of Apache projects have had good experience on using a
> Confluence wiki as a kind of a CMS for editing their web sites. How
> would you feel if we took the same approach in Jackrabbit? Write
> access to the web site wiki w
Hi jukka,
Can we the start the doc with the new jackrabbit wiki ?
br,
Christophe
On 10/3/07, Jukka Zitting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 9/13/07, Jukka Zitting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I hear a number of Apache projects have had good experience on using a
> > Confluence wiki as
