On 12/6/06, Dennis Lundberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
There is also an import fix that makes it possible to use JCL in applets
again. We had to revert back to 1.0.4 because of that bug. I want to
verify this fix, but don't have the time right now. Perhaps this weekend...
snap/
Seems
On 12/7/06, Yonik Seeley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FYI, for some minor changes to CSV, I'm using the commit-then-review
protocol, esp since there don't seem to be many CSV followers. Holler
if that doesn't work for you :-)
I deprecated setStrategy() as it doesn't make much sense... I don't
http://people.apache.org/~rahul/commons/scxml-0.6/rc1/
Notes:
* This is a m1 JDK 1.4 RC (Commons SCXML is JDK 1.4+). Given the
ibiblio situation, please note the build may fail if it cannot fetch
the dependencies (which is easy to correct, but has to be done
locally)
* The v0.6 resources links
On 8 Dec 2006 16:33:09 -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Failed build logs:
http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/commons-nightlies/20061208/chain.log
http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/commons-nightlies/20061208/fileupload.log
snip/
I've deployed a 1.3-snap for IO under the
We may need separate profiles for PuTTY users in commons-parent?
IIUC, the decision of choosing a wagon provider depends on the snaps
repo URL, so we would need a scpexe:// URL to get the Wagon SSH
External Provider (thereby we can use plink etc.). Anyone got a better
handle on this?
-Rahul
On 12/8/06, Jochen Wiedmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/8/06, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We may need separate profiles for PuTTY users in commons-parent?
Why do you want to use putty? The wagon scp protocol has, IMO, the
charm that it doesn't depend on any external programs
On 12/8/06, Jochen Wiedmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
On 12/8/06, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to use my existing Pageant keys when on Windoze (and
additionally, I don't want cygwin).
Sorry for asking more dumb questions: What are Pageant keys? I am
using private keys
On 12/8/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/8/06, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8 Dec 2006 16:33:09 -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Failed build logs:
http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/commons-nightlies/20061208/chain.log
http://people.apache.org
On 12/8/06, Jochen Wiedmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/8/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Basically we type our passphrases in once when the OS comes up and
from that point on we can ssh/scp to machines without having to enter
passwords/passphrases.
I admit that I still do not
On 11/25/06, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i've cut an RC3 including niall's improvements. it's available from
http://people.apache.org/~rdonkin/commons-betwixt. please review.
snip/
AFAICT, we need a RC4 (with final version numbers) and a vote. You've
done most to all of the
On 12/10/06, Jochen Wiedmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
Duplicating the most important part of the POM (and maintaining both
source and duplicate in the future) seems to me to be bad practice, at
least if you aren't forced to do it. I do not see that we are forced.
snap/
Missing
On 12/11/06, Jörg Schaible [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Martin Cooper wrote on Sunday, December 10, 2006 11:06 PM:
snip/
I didn't say anything about duplicating anything. Why can't
we split out the
scp-related part into separate profiles, one for scp and one for
scpexe? That way, you could
On 12/11/06, Mario Ivankovits [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Robert!
release candidate 4 is available @
http://people.apache.org/~rdonkin/commons-betwixt/ and the site @
http://people.apache.org/~rdonkin/commons-betwixt/site/
I've updated my gpg key store using gpg ---refresh-keys and got your
On 12/9/06, Mario Ivankovits [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
After an eventful year and some help from others I managed to cut a new RC.
snip/
I see Niall has already made some improvements (thanks).
Ofcourse its upto you, but I'd suggest making the (new) RC available
for a few days before
On 12/11/06, Mario Ivankovits [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
And I too would like another way how we move forward to a release (at
least if my understanding matches with what you mean).
Is it like this?:
*) create a version tag in svn - the final tag - in this case vfs-1.0
snap/
No, tag
On 12/11/06, Mario Ivankovits [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Rahul!
No, tag remains VFS_1_0_RC9.
Hmmm ... I don't understand why we still need the RC tags, if something
is dangerous, than that we have artifacts with a release version
numbering even if its not the real final release.
snip/
On 12/11/06, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2006-12-11 at 11:12 -0500, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
snip/
http://www.apache.org/dist/jakarta/commons/betwixt/KEYS
snap/
Should've looked there, thanks.
Also, I personally favor (now) the style with which we've made
On 12/10/06, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
--8
[ ] +1 Release Commons Betwixt 0.8
[X] +0
[ ] -0
[ ] -1 Do not release Commons Betwixt 0.8
] (date of the release) show the JEXL 1.1 artifacts being
added (at the above URL). Having read the rest of the thread, looks
like they got mirrored just fine, but if you need me to do anything
else in this regard, just let me know.
-Rahul
[1] http://tinyurl.com/yha8b9
Niall
On 9/7/06, Rahul
On 12/12/06, Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Looks good to me - only problem I had was with trying out the build
and jexl 1.1 jar missing - once I installed that locally it was all
fine though.
snip/
Thanks for your time and the feedback (replied on the JEXL thread
about that one).
On 12/12/06, Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/12/06, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
There appears to be some behind-the-scenes-magic here. The September
9th logs [1] (date of the release) show the JEXL 1.1 artifacts being
added (at the above URL). Having read
Having made a couple of (IMO, minor) changes, I've cut RC2. Towards that as 0.6:
http://people.apache.org/~rahul/commons/scxml-0.6/rc2/
[ ] +1 I support this release
[ ] +0
[ ] -0
[ ] -1 I do not support this release because...
Vote closes no sooner than Saturday,
On 12/13/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fixed. Thanks Chris.
snip/
OTOH, if the original authors agree, might be worthwhile changing the
ant task source to match the (earlier) documentation, since destdir,
IMO, is a better choice than dstdir (being in sandbox helps here).
-Rahul
Did some downstream testing:
* RDC taglib trunk builds, examples app works
* Shale trunk builds, test app works, serialiization (for session
persistence) seems fine
On 12/13/06, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Having made a couple of (IMO, minor) changes, I've cut RC2. Towards
Vote is scheduled to close in half a day, please ping if you want more time.
-Rahul
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 12/16/06, Jörg Schaible [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
RELEASE-NOTES.txt talks of JEXL 1.1 and JCL 1.1 though, dependency report
reveils usage of JEXL 1.0 and JCL 1.0.4.
snip/
Sorry, I was testing various dep versions after cutting the RC, and
looks like I mistimed the RC site deploy. On the
Commons SCXML 0.6 release vote passes with 5 +1s and no other votes.
+1:
Oliver Heger
Rahul Akolkar
Craig McClanahan
Niall Pemberton
Jörg Schaible
Thanks to everyone who participated.
-Rahul
On 12/13/06, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Having made a couple of (IMO, minor) changes
:
http://jakarta.apache.org/site/downloads/downloads_commons-scxml.cgi
For more information on Commons SCXML, visit the project home page:
http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/scxml/
-Rahul Akolkar
on behalf of the Jakarta Commons community
s/Jakarta Commons/Jakarta/
On 12/20/06, Phil Steitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
8---
[X] +1 Let him commit!
-
-Rahul
On 12/19/06, Mario Ivankovits [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
[X] +1 I support this release
[ ] +0
[ ] -0
[ ] -1 I do not support this release because...
snap/
-Rahul
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
On 12/24/06, Phil Steitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This vote has passed.
+1 - Phil Steitz*, Rahul Akolkar*, Oliver Heger, Rory Winston*, Jorg
Schaible*, Niall Pemberton*, Martin van den Bemt*, Brent Worden
no other votes recorded.
snip/
By my count, this tally is missing additional +1s from
On 12/26/06, Henri Yandell (JIRA) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-302?page=all ]
Henri Yandell closed LANG-302.
--
Resolution: Fixed
svn ci -m StrBuilder no longer implements Cloneable. #LANG-302 src/java/
Sending
On 12/27/06, Joerg Heinicke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
when playing around with commons transaction I did a test compile with
JDK 1.3. I wonder if we can still claim that 1.3 is the minimum requirement.
One bug in the build.xml I fixed already [1]. But you still can't
compile commons
And the link to post mentioned below:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=jakarta-commons-devm=116552696400850w=2
-Rahul
On 12/27/06, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/27/06, Joerg Heinicke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
when playing around with commons transaction I did a test
On 12/28/06, Jochen Wiedmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
in light of
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=jakarta-commons-devm=116560781629523w=2
and following a suggestion by Jörg Schaible, I'd like to propose the
attached patch. It introduces properties
commons.deployment.protocol
On 12/29/06, Dennis Lundberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
The idea of using a different protocol is fine by me, as long as I can
continue to use scp is I want to. That does seem to be the default
setting. So +1 for that.
snap/
scpexe (see patch at the bottom of the email -- yes, formatting
On 1/2/07, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
I dislike the website being put in the distributions. It's a cheap way
to think you're documenting your project; but having the documentation
in there is good. I think the solution to this part is to make our
websites leaner (by moving
On 1/3/07, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
Part of all that would be to take the common information out of the
component sites and into a Jakarta page for that component. Much like
the download section currently. The tricky part is one of lf, it's
very odd to jump out of a site and
On 1/3/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: scolebourne
Date: Wed Jan 3 16:10:13 2007
New Revision: 492361
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=492361
Log:
LANG-310 - BooleanUtils isNotTrue/isNotFalse
Modified:
jakarta/commons/proper/lang/trunk/RELEASE-NOTES.txt
On 1/5/07, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
[X] +1
[ ] -1
-Rahul
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 1/8/07, Jörg Schaible [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Dennis,
Dennis Lundberg wrote:
[snip]
- Id has test failures in M2, which I haven't been able to solve. I
temporarily added a configuration so that the build succeeds even if
there are test failures.
I tried to look at this, but where's
On 1/8/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: joerg
Date: Mon Jan 8 13:41:21 2007
New Revision: 494203
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=494203
snip/
This change warrants a major release for [transaction].
-Rahul
Log:
TRANSACTION-11: Added
On 1/8/07, Joerg Heinicke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rahul Akolkar rahul.akolkar at gmail.com writes:
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=494203
snip/
This change warrants a major release for [transaction].
Really? I don't mind if the current code is release as 2.0
On 1/9/07, Jörg Schaible [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Rahul,
Rahul Akolkar wrote on Monday, January 08, 2007 8:47 PM:
snip/
In trunks-sandbox, more specifically:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jakarta/commons/trunks-sandbo
x/pom.xml
IMHO it makes more sense to have an own commons
On 1/4/07, Dennis Lundberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
Before I dive head-first into this I thought I'd ask first. I'd like to
unify the M2 generated sites for all sandbox components, by making use
of commons-skin. This would mean:
1. Make various changes to the sandbox-parent, which is
On 1/10/07, Joerg Heinicke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rahul Akolkar rahul.akolkar at gmail.com writes:
Generally speaking, an interface-compatible change will at most change the
private interface of a component, or simply add classes, methods and
attributes whose use is optional to both
On 1/11/07, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thought I'd start by commenting on the state of releases:
IO - blocked on the Exception issue atm - see active thread on commons-dev.
Lang - blocked by the cyclic bug needing to be fixed.
The next week and a half is going to be busy for me (my
On 1/17/07, Phil Steitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/17/07, Martin van den Bemt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am doing user, general, private, cvs, etc (and need to find the gaps
that are currently at
Jakarta). Also a couple of non jakarta lists though.. 98% is spam and
nicely marked as such
On 1/23/07, Phil Steitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have created a release candidate for DBCP 1.2.2.
snip/
Looks good. IMO, it'd be better if the artifacts contain the final
version number when you call the vote.
As nits, I'd also suggest:
* Including filename in md5s
* Building with JDK 1.3
On 1/23/07, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've made a second release candidate of IO 1.3, tagged IO_1_3_RC2.
snip/
[X] +1
[ ] -1
snap/
-Rahul
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands,
On 1/28/07, Phil Steitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/23/07, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/23/07, Phil Steitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have created a release candidate for DBCP 1.2.2.
snip/
Looks good. IMO, it'd be better if the artifacts contain the final
version
On 1/28/07, Phil Steitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/28/07, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/28/07, Phil Steitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/23/07, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
As nits, I'd also suggest:
* Including filename in md5s
* Building
On 2/2/07, Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/1/07, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
What do people think - update PROPOSALs or delete them?
Neither - leave it unchanged. It is historical and I think it is
obvious it is, many (most?) components have them and I've
Cross-posting since reply-to goes to dev, but probably a user list
question. If this thread continues, please pick a single list.
On 2/6/07, Apache Wiki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on Jakarta-commons Wiki
for change
On 2/6/07, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
We have two ways:
1) Do a mock release called 1.4-rc1. The version number of the source
is 1.4-rc1, it's tagged 1.4-rc1 etc. It can hang around for ages and
go into production if a user happens to find it and take it there.
What we are
On 2/9/07, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here's the 3rd release candidate for Lang 2.3:
http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang/commons-lang-2.3-rc3/
Clirr, Jardiff + Site included.
[X] +1
[ ] -1
snip/
Nits:
* Format release notes (other than the JIRA roadmap bits) -- width
On 2/9/07, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Going with RC3:
http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-io/1.3.1-rc3/
The only change is that I've fixed the manifest to say 1.3.1 and not 1.3.
[X] +1
[ ] -1
snip/
Nits:
* Some of the POM cruft might as well be removed (such as cobertura
On 2/12/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: luc
Date: Mon Feb 12 11:17:41 2007
New Revision: 506585
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=506585
Log:
Added and used a specialized convergence exception for exceeded iteration counts
Added:
On 2/12/07, Phil Steitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
The release zips/tarballs are here:
http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/dbcp-1.2.2-RC2/
snap/
-
[X] +1 - Yes, release these bits
[ ] +0
On 2/12/07, Luc Maisonobe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
This file, and many others seem to be missing the eol-style settings,
causing much larger diffs. Please look through [math] and add the
correct SVN properties, where needed.
Yes, it seems many files have strange settings. I use a
On 2/19/07, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As a sidethread to the email on sandbox components, I'd also like to
explore retiring some of our released components [or making them
dormant if that's the preferred term].
The ones that jump out to me are:
* attributes [needs a release to fix
On 2/18/07, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm interested in knowing where things are with each of the
non-dormant sandboxes. ie) Convince me why I shouldn't be proposing
that a component be moved to dormant.
snip/
I more or less agree with things Tim says here [1].
On related notes:
On 2/19/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: mbenson
Date: Mon Feb 19 15:24:43 2007
New Revision: 509378
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=509378
Log:
bulled through JXPath codebase to get a little better familiarity; tiny
refactorings and removals of unnecessary
On 2/22/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: dion
Date: Thu Feb 22 15:35:23 2007
New Revision: 510708
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=510708
Log:
EMAIL-50 HTML Emails with images don't display in Outlook 2000
Modified:
On 3/12/07, Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/12/07, Oliver Zeigermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have now created a Wiki page for the 2.0 discussion:
http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/Brainstorm_2%2e0
Not a particularly good page name, given that it's not scoped to
On 3/12/07, Jochen Wiedmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
as discussed last week, I have created a distribution of the
docbook-maven-plugin.
snip/
Wrong list, I presume.
-Rahul
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 3/15/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: bayard
Date: Thu Mar 15 09:31:32 2007
New Revision: 518681
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=518681
Log:
Adding CLI 1 and CLI Avalon to the list of active trunks
snip/
I don't like this idea of having multiple trunks
On 3/15/07, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/15/07, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/15/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: bayard
Date: Thu Mar 15 09:31:32 2007
New Revision: 518681
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=518681
Log
On 3/15/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: jochen
Date: Thu Mar 15 15:02:46 2007
New Revision: 518770
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=518770
Log:
Made the FileCleaningTracker serializable.
This is required by commons-fileupload, because the
DiskFileItem's may
On 3/16/07, Torsten Curdt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK ...so here is the story. There is bug in the 1.0 release of CLI
that I've encountered a couple of times now. This time while I was
writing a javac compatible command line interface for the jci
examples. So I thought I have a look at the
On 3/16/07, Torsten Curdt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to bring this well before an actual vote.
At the moment I am still in the middle of documenting and fixing up
JCI for a first 1.0 release. I hope to be able to provide a first RC1
at the end of next week ...latest the week after.
Please open an enhancement request in JIRA [1]. Proposals on the
mailing list tend to get lost unless there is immediate interest /
cycles available. Thanks.
-Rahul
[1] http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JEXL
On 3/17/07, Dimitri Papaioannou [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please let me know if
On 3/20/07, Stephen Colebourne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stephen has spent a considerable amount of effort in discussions and
chivying in the commons area, particularly on commons-collections.
In another life he has been heavily involved in one of the existing
generics ports of collections -
On 3/21/07, Stephen Kestle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
Just out of interest, are people voting for me because:
* of Stephen (C)'s recommendation
* of my correspondance (do people actually read all these emails?)
* it's the cool thing to do / I seem to be ok
snap/
I will reply
On 3/21/07, Stephen Kestle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
Thanks for the answer - apologies to those who thought my questions a
bit forward (I was only intending to get a reply or two).
snap/
Nah, not my intent at all, no apologies necessary IMO.
-Rahul
On 3/22/07, Kevin Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I noticed this small typo so here's a patch to correct it
snip/
Patch did not make it to the list (atleast my mailbox). Suggest using JIRA [1].
-Rahul
[1] http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JXPATH
Thanks,
Kev
On 3/25/07, Phil Steitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have fixed the JRockit test compatibility issue raised during the first
DBCP 1.2.2 release vote and would like to kick off a new release vote based
on RC3, with links provided below.
snip/
+1
-Rahul
Since RC2, the following changes have
On 3/28/07, Torsten Curdt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As already announced I would like to move
http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/sandbox/jci/
out of the sandbox so I can then prepare a first RC. Please cast your
votes for the graduation!
snip/
+0
I won't be able to help or get involved any
On 4/2/07, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/2/07, Phil Steitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
+0 for waiting to do this until we have a clear idea of where the rest
of the Jakarta subprojects are going.
Once we go TLP, I imagine a few would head in our direction, whereas
until we
On 4/10/07, Torsten Curdt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since RC1 is working fine for cocoon and other parties I would like
to call a vote on the release for commons jci.
http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/jci/
snip/
The site menus on all of the module sites seem broken (numerous 404s).
While
On 4/15/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: sebb
Date: Sun Apr 15 10:18:33 2007
New Revision: 529017
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=529017
Log:
CLI2 - Avalon
Modified:
jakarta/commons/proper/cli/branches/avalon-implementation/src/conf/MANIFEST.MF
On 4/15/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: sebb
Date: Sun Apr 15 11:33:27 2007
New Revision: 529044
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=529044
Log:
Create minimal POM
Added:
jakarta/commons/proper/cli/branches/avalon-implementation/pom.xml (with
props)
On 4/15/07, sebb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 15/04/07, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/15/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: sebb
Date: Sun Apr 15 11:33:27 2007
New Revision: 529044
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=529044
Log:
Create
On 4/17/07, Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
AIU projects using m2 that vote on actual release artifacts use a
staging repository - but I guess that would take a change in the
commons pom first. Anyway ignore my comment - I've not done a release
using m2 and I guess if you resolve
On 4/23/07, Dennis Lundberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: tcurdt
Date: Tue Apr 17 16:46:08 2007
New Revision: 529805
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=529805
Log:
rephrased a few o=paragraphs,
fixed broken links
Modified:
On 4/23/07, Dennis Lundberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rahul Akolkar wrote:
On 4/23/07, Dennis Lundberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: tcurdt
Date: Tue Apr 17 16:46:08 2007
New Revision: 529805
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=529805
Log
On 4/25/07, maestro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have tried to locate some information on how to obtain the latest source
for v1.7.1 and build it.
I found information on how to build it... but nothing on how to get the
source. :(
Can anyone help me?
snip/
svn co
On 4/27/07, Ingmar Kliche [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rahul,
nice to see that you are already working on the Feb '07 WD support. We
really appreciate this! Thank you for your effort!
How far are these changes?
snip/
Most of the structural changes for the core state machine bits are
done, for
On 5/18/07, Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
Having said that - the current situation has been in place for over 2
years and there haven't been complaints until now.
snap/
Yup, and I don't perceive any urgency here (not that I'd want us to
recommend this again).
-Rahul
On 5/15/07, Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There are a couple of Jira tickets which require JDK 1.4
IO-74[1] - Regular Expression IOFileFilter implementation
IO-77[2] - FileUtils.move() method that uses NIO
Are there any objections to moving Commons IO's minimum requirement to
JDK
Was there a response to my comment [1] about r518770?
-Rahul
(long, possibly fragmented URL below)
[1]
On 5/18/07, Jochen Wiedmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/18/07, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Was there a response to my comment [1] about r518770?
Sorry, I wasn't reading your comment. But, to be honest, I have to
admit that after reading it, I do not understand what you propose
On 5/25/07, Ingmar Kliche [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I noticed that commons-scxml executes multiple transitions on one event as
soon as multiple transitions (i.e. multiple transitions exist for one event)
match. The SCXML spec instead says that only one transition has to be taken
(the first in
On 5/28/07, Ingmar Kliche [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rahul,
the send tag may be used to send events to external systems or to
raise (external) events within the current SCXML session. I'm trying
to structure my SCXML document into logically and hierarchically separated
state machines (within one
On 5/18/07, Jochen Wiedmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to push out version 3 of the commons-parent project. The
changes in maven-sources-plugin 2.0.3 allow to get rid of the
maven-antrun hack and that's reason enough, IMO.
snip/
[X] +1
[ ] =0
[ ] -1
On 5/30/07, Dennis Lundberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is the second attempt to release version 3 of commons-parent.
The revision to vote on is 542829.
snip/
[X] +1
[ ] =0
[ ] -1
-Rahul
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
On 5/30/07, Matt Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Pete--
I could be interested in being the Jakarta commons
conduit for a revival of the functor code. According
to the jakarta website, A revival of a Commons
Dormant component must be preceded by a VOTE on the
commons developers mailing
On 5/30/07, Matt Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
Right, I meant whether the vote should be held as in
are there any reasons why reviving [functor] would be
simply out of the question? I wasn't implying any
desire to circumvent established protocols. :)
snap/
Not sure if there is
On 6/1/07, Ingmar Kliche [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rahul,
within a transition (which is gets eventdata from outside) I'd like to
forward some pieces of the eventdata structure using a send with namelist:
transition event=change
if cond = _eventdata.eventSource == 'x'
send
On 6/2/07, peter royal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 1, 2007, at 10:09 PM, Dion Gillard wrote:
+1
done! see http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/jakarta/commons/proper/jexl/
trunk/src/test/org/apache/commons/jexl/MapLiteralTest.java?
view=markup for example usage.
snip/
Cool. Can you complete the
501 - 600 of 862 matches
Mail list logo
