[jbehave-dev] Re: Jbehave tutorials

2012-09-06 Thread Alexander Lehmann
The bdd by example article is using jbehave 2, that will require quite a bit adapting to work with a current version. There are a few articles links at http://jbehave.org/users-experiences.html. On 06.09.2012 23:26, Mani Sarkar wrote: HI, Can anyone suggest useful Jbehave tutorials that I cou

Re: [jbehave-dev] Re: Jbehave tutorials

2012-09-07 Thread Mani Sarkar
Yes I noticed that, which is why I joined the group to find out about the intricacies of jbehave! I fixed the issues it was okay, except for pending issue. Thanks for the reference. On 6 Sep 2012 23:56, "Alexander Lehmann" wrote: > The bdd by example article is using jbehave 2, that will require

Re: [jbehave-dev] Re: Jbehave tutorials

2012-09-07 Thread Mauro Talevi
What is your pending issue? On 07/09/2012 17:20, Mani Sarkar wrote: Yes I noticed that, which is why I joined the group to find out about the intricacies of jbehave! I fixed the issues it was okay, except for pending issue. Thanks for the reference. On 6 Sep 2012 23:56, "Alexander Lehmann"

Re: [jbehave-dev] Re: Jbehave tutorials

2012-09-09 Thread Mani Sarkar
I get the below, and can't tell why its throwing this error - I checked the types of the two variables and they are the same yet all the assertThat() calls return similar errors as below. java.lang.AssertionError: Expected: <[E1, A1, D2, G3, B4, B4, B4, e7, e5]> got: <[E1, A1, D2, G3, B4, B4,

Re: [jbehave-dev] Re: Jbehave tutorials

2012-09-10 Thread Mauro Talevi
Mani, this has nothing to do with JBehave. You doing an assertion between to variable, using Assert.assertThat() which in turn uses Hamcrest's Matcher. Try experimenting with matchers in separate unit tests using the variables that you've specified. Cheers On 09/09/2012 22:55, Mani Sarkar