Re: [jclouds-labs-openstack] The create and stream methods in the Message API for OpenStack Marconi. (#46)

Indeed! :) --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/46#issuecomment-28621429

RE: Project Lombok - Builders (and other annotations)

Pretty much all of these require that your ide compiles with their jar in the classpath as a provided dep. Some IDEs also require explicit enabling of annotation processing. Maven integration is pretty tight wrt this in IDEs I've used. When you change a source file, it is processed with auto or

Re: Project Lombok - Builders (and other annotations)

Ps Auto Value (currently) uses asm for bytecode manipulation as opposed to Auto Factory, which writes generated source files (via javawriter). Makes it more magicy, but not necessarily bad. -A On Nov 14, 2013 10:42 PM, "Andrew Gaul" wrote: > On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 11:11:35AM -0800, Andrew Gaul

Re: [jclouds-site] JCLOUDS-215 Adds autoscale documentation. (#32)

> +1. Open Constants.java for editing. > +1. Go to the example code > [Constants.java](https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-examples/blob/master/rackspace/src/main/java/org/jclouds/examples/rackspace/autoscale/Constants.java), > read it over, and copy the code into your file. > + > +### Compile and

Re: [jclouds-site] JCLOUDS-215 Adds autoscale documentation. (#32)

> +1. Open Constants.java for editing. > +1. Go to the example code > [Constants.java](https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-examples/blob/master/rackspace/src/main/java/org/jclouds/examples/rackspace/autoscale/Constants.java), > read it over, and copy the code into your file. > + > +### Compile and

Re: [jclouds-site] JCLOUDS-215 Adds autoscale documentation. (#32)

> +1. You can find these APIs in the latest > [Javadoc](http://demobox.github.com/jclouds-maven-site/latest/apidocs). > + > +### The Source Code > + > +1. Create the directory hierarchy > org/jclouds/examples/rackspace/clouddatabases/ in your jclouds directory. > +1. Create Java source files call

Re: [jclouds-site] JCLOUDS-215 Adds autoscale documentation. (#32)

Thanks for the updates! Something weird going on with the numbering now:  --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/32#issuecomment-28613914

Re: [jclouds] JCLOUDS-381. Allow explicit naming of nodes via TemplateOptions. (#206)

[jclouds-java-7-pull-requests #871](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-java-7-pull-requests/871/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/206#issuecomment-28610592

Re: [jclouds] JCLOUDS-381. Allow explicit naming of nodes via TemplateOptions. (#206)

[jclouds-pull-requests #408](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-pull-requests/408/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/206#issuecomment-28610325

Jenkins build is back to normal : jclouds » jclouds #629

See

Re: [jclouds] JCLOUDS-381. Allow explicit naming of nodes via TemplateOptions. (#206)

Ok, actually, turned out to be less than an hour of work. woo? Softlayer still only supports old groups, but every other provider in core should be good. I've done live tests against EC2, HP Cloud, and (with a yet-to-be-pushed branch) GCE. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: h

Re: [jclouds-labs-openstack] The create and stream methods in the Message API for OpenStack Marconi. (#46)

Thanks for your review patience, @everett-toews! --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/46#issuecomment-28606163

Re: [jclouds-labs-openstack] The create and stream methods in the Message API for OpenStack Marconi. (#46)

> > - protected QueueStats(MessagesStats messages) { > - this.messages = messages; > + protected QueueStats(MessagesStats messageStats) { > + this.messages = checkNotNull(messageStats); [minor] `checkNotNull(messageStats, "messageStats required");`? --- Reply to this email directl

Jenkins build is back to normal : jclouds #2396

See

Jenkins build is back to normal : jclouds » jclouds loadbalancer core #2396

See

Build failed in Jenkins: jclouds » jclouds #628

See -- [...truncated 20854 lines...] at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:354) at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:424) at sun.misc.Lau

Re: [jclouds] JCLOUDS-383. Adding c3 instance sizes. (#208)

[jclouds » jclouds #628](https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds/628/) FAILURE Looks like there's a problem with this pull request [(what's this?)](https://www.cloudbees.com/what-is-buildhive) --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jcloud

Re: [jclouds] JCLOUDS-383. Adding c3 instance sizes. (#208)

[jclouds-java-7-pull-requests #870](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-java-7-pull-requests/870/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/208#issuecomment-28604714

Re: [jclouds] JCLOUDS-383. Adding c3 instance sizes. (#208)

[jclouds-pull-requests #407](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-pull-requests/407/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/208#issuecomment-28604696

Re: [jclouds] JCLOUDS-381. Allow explicit naming of nodes via TemplateOptions. (#206)

Yup, looks like I need to add logic to every API/provider to save the group in instance metadata or somewhere similar, which is gonna necessitate a fair amount of work. I think I can probably get it done this weekend, though. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.

Re: [jclouds] JCLOUDS-381. Allow explicit naming of nodes via TemplateOptions. (#206)

Live tests are coming together, but not quite there yet - some problems in the tests themselves, but also the realization that marking nodes as in a group becomes more problematic when you can't necessarily rely on the instance name to figure out what "group" they're in. I'm playing around with

RE: Project Lombok - Builders (and other annotations)

I didn't check - how's the IDE situation with auto? I might find the time to add it in some refactorings I have to do anyways. From: Adrian Cole [adrian.f.c...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, November 15, 2013 11:58 AM To: dev@jclouds.apache.org Subject: Re: Proje

Re: [jclouds] JCLOUDS-381. Allow explicit naming of nodes via TemplateOptions. (#206)

Working on live tests now - trying to figure out whether the failures I'm seeing are just erratic. I'm tending to think they're not consistently reproducible, but I'm not 100% sure. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/206#issuecomment-28

Re: [jclouds] JCLODUS-383. Adding c3 instance sizes. (#208)

[jclouds-java-7-pull-requests #868](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-java-7-pull-requests/868/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/208#issuecomment-28592810

Re: [jclouds] JCLODUS-383. Adding c3 instance sizes. (#208)

[jclouds-java-7-pull-requests #869](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-java-7-pull-requests/869/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/208#issuecomment-28592811

Re: [jclouds] JCLODUS-383. Adding c3 instance sizes. (#208)

[jclouds-pull-requests #406](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-pull-requests/406/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/208#issuecomment-28592639

Re: [jclouds] JCLODUS-383. Adding c3 instance sizes. (#208)

[jclouds-pull-requests #405](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-pull-requests/405/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/208#issuecomment-28592638

Re: [jclouds] JCLOUDS-381. Allow explicit naming of nodes via TemplateOptions. (#206)

[jclouds » jclouds #626](https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds/626/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good [(what's this?)](https://www.cloudbees.com/what-is-buildhive) --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/206#issuecomment

[jclouds] JCLODUS-383. Adding c3 instance sizes. (#209)

You can merge this Pull Request by running: git pull https://github.com/abayer/jclouds-1 jclouds-383-1.6.x Or you can view, comment on it, or merge it online at: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/209 -- Commit Summary -- * JCLODUS-383. Adding c3 instance sizes. -- File Changes --

[jclouds] JCLODUS-383. Adding c3 instance sizes. (#208)

You can merge this Pull Request by running: git pull https://github.com/abayer/jclouds-1 jclouds-383 Or you can view, comment on it, or merge it online at: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/208 -- Commit Summary -- * JCLODUS-383. Adding c3 instance sizes. -- File Changes --

Re: Project Lombok - Builders (and other annotations)

FWIW, I plan to help with auto anyway. If you have problems trying it out, cc me on the github issue. -A On Nov 14, 2013 10:42 PM, "Andrew Gaul" wrote: > On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 11:11:35AM -0800, Andrew Gaul wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 10:36:26AM -0800, Jeremy Daggett wrote: > > > Hi dev

Re: restarting the 1.6.3 release process on Friday

Andrew, wait to kick off the 1.6.3 release process 'til I have a patch for https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-383 if that's alright - it should be a trivial change, and it'd very good to have in there... I'll have a patch by noon. A. On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 5:15 AM, Andrea Turli wrote

Re: [jclouds] JCLOUDS-381. Allow explicit naming of nodes via TemplateOptions. (#206)

[jclouds-pull-requests #404](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-pull-requests/404/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/206#issuecomment-28587935

Re: [jclouds] JCLOUDS-381. Allow explicit naming of nodes via TemplateOptions. (#206)

[jclouds-java-7-pull-requests #867](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-java-7-pull-requests/867/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/206#issuecomment-28587965

Re: [jclouds] JCLOUDS-381. Allow explicit naming of nodes via TemplateOptions. (#206)

Tests will pass now - the change that caused the tests to fail was actually me screwing up and deleting something, not the intended changes. Woopsie. About to try live tests! --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/206#issuecomment-28586013

Re: [jclouds] JCLOUDS-381. Allow explicit naming of nodes via TemplateOptions. (#206)

> @@ -353,7 +355,7 @@ public void testCreateTwoNodesWithRunScript() throws > Exception { >NodeMetadata node2 = nodes.last(); >// credentials aren't always the same >// assertEquals(node1.getCredentials(), node2.getCredentials()); > - > + System.err.println("node 1 baby

Build failed in Jenkins: jclouds #2395

See Changes: [Everett Toews] Style fixes and corrections. -- [...truncated 10076 lines...] [Unloading class GregorSamsa$1] [Unloading class GregorSamsa] [Unloading class GregorSamsa] [Unloading cl

Build failed in Jenkins: jclouds » jclouds loadbalancer core #2395

See -- Nov 15, 2013 12:09:32 PM org.apache.maven.cli.event.ExecutionEventLogger projectStarted INFO:

Re: 1.7.0 scheduling

+1 Best, Alex On Nov 15, 2013 4:22 PM, "Everett Toews" wrote: > On Nov 14, 2013, at 12:18 PM, Andrew Bayer wrote: > > > So with 1.6.3 aiming to be out next week, I'd like to put a target date > on > > 1.7.0 - we really need to get that sucker out! I'm gonna tentatively plan > > to do the first R

Re: [jclouds-labs-openstack] The create and stream methods in the Message API for OpenStack Marconi. (#46)

[jclouds-labs-openstack-pull-requests #97](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-labs-openstack-pull-requests/97/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/46#issuecomment-28584432

Re: 1.7.0 scheduling

On Nov 14, 2013, at 12:18 PM, Andrew Bayer wrote: > So with 1.6.3 aiming to be out next week, I'd like to put a target date on > 1.7.0 - we really need to get that sucker out! I'm gonna tentatively plan > to do the first RC on Monday, December 9th. +1 Everett

RE: Project Lombok - Builders (and other annotations)

They have good documentation... From: Andrew Gaul [g...@apache.org] Sent: Friday, November 15, 2013 12:42 AM To: dev@jclouds.apache.org Subject: Re: Project Lombok - Builders (and other annotations) On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 11:11:35AM -0800, Andrew Gaul wrot

Re: [jclouds] applies tidies for imageChooser (JCLOUDS-331) as suggested in pull #202 (#207)

[jclouds » jclouds #624](https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds/624/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good [(what's this?)](https://www.cloudbees.com/what-is-buildhive) --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/207#issuecomment

Jenkins build is back to stable : jclouds » jclouds #624

See

Re: [jclouds] applies tidies for imageChooser (JCLOUDS-331) as suggested in pull #202 (#207)

[jclouds » jclouds #623](https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds/623/) UNSTABLE Looks like there's a problem with this pull request [(what's this?)](https://www.cloudbees.com/what-is-buildhive) --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclou

Re: [jclouds] applies tidies for imageChooser (JCLOUDS-331) as suggested in pull #202 (#207)

[jclouds-pull-requests #403](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-pull-requests/403/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/207#issuecomment-28557815

Re: [jclouds] applies tidies for imageChooser (JCLOUDS-331) as suggested in pull #202 (#207)

[jclouds-java-7-pull-requests #866](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-java-7-pull-requests/866/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/207#issuecomment-28557833

Re: [jclouds] applies tidies for imageChooser (JCLOUDS-331) as suggested in pull #202 (#207)

[jclouds-java-7-pull-requests #865](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-java-7-pull-requests/865/) UNSTABLE Looks like there's a problem with this pull request --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/207#issuecomment-28557627

Re: [jclouds] applies tidies for imageChooser (JCLOUDS-331) as suggested in pull #202 (#207)

[jclouds-pull-requests #402](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-pull-requests/402/) UNSTABLE Looks like there's a problem with this pull request --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/207#issuecomment-28557625

Re: [jclouds] jclouds-331 - imageChooser function backport (#202)

cool. done in #207. what command were you running when you got the whitespace warnings? happy to clean those up also. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/202#issuecomment-28556865

[jclouds] applies tidies for imageChooser (JCLOUDS-331) as suggested in pull #202 (#207)

good suggestions in #202 @demobox, thanks You can merge this Pull Request by running: git pull https://github.com/ahgittin/jclouds imageChooser-tidy Or you can view, comment on it, or merge it online at: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/207 -- Commit Summary -- * applies tidies fo

Re: [jclouds] JCLOUDS-381. Allow explicit naming of nodes via TemplateOptions. (#206)

I've had a look and looks good to me. I'd be extremely happy to have this merged once tests pass! (I can only vote once in jira, though :D) --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/206#issuecomment-28552805