Re: [gsoc] Working on JClouds

2014-03-11 Thread Roman C. Coedo
Sure, i don't mind implementing Glacier support instead. I'll start my proposal then. Thanks for your help. 2014-03-11 19:55 GMT+01:00 Andrew Gaul : > Roman, we have several students already interested in GCS, including a > proposal draft. Perhaps you could implement Glacier support instead? >

Re: [gsoc] Working on JClouds

2014-03-11 Thread Andrew Gaul
Roman, we have several students already interested in GCS, including a proposal draft. Perhaps you could implement Glacier support instead? This has a smaller API but will have interesting interactions with jclouds due to the slow random access of Glacier storage: https://issues.apache.org/jira/b

[gsoc] Working on JClouds

2014-03-11 Thread Roman C. Coedo
Hi, I would like to participate on the GSoC this year. I found out about JClouds while i was checking the ideas submitted by the ASF and this is the kind of project i would love to work on. Checking the issue list this one ( https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-458) got my attention. I a

Re: GCE query

2014-03-11 Thread Richard Downer
Suriya, Andrea, It's also possible to request a quota increase from Google - there is a form to do this somewhere inside the web console. I've had to go through this process a couple of times, it was easy to fill in the form and both times I have had my request approved in less than a day. Richar

Re: GCE query

2014-03-11 Thread Andrea Turli
Suriya, unfortunately I can see your limit is pretty low (5 networks) and I suspect the LiveTests are going to create more than 5. I've issued PR that proposes a fix for this high number of networks created by jclouds ( https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-google/pull/20) but it is still unmerg

Re: GCE query

2014-03-11 Thread Ignasi Barrera
Hi, If you don't specify any template details, jclouds will try to find an image known to work in the provider. The predicate you are seeing is the default one defined for the GCE provider [1], but it seems that it's not the appropriate one. That predicate should always find a usable template (at

Re: GCE query

2014-03-11 Thread Sathyasuriya Priya
hi Andrea, Thanks for your suggestion. I deleted the networks/firewalls/routes in quota page and retried. Tests run: 86, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 11 << problem applying options to node(us-central1-a/google-compute-enginer-d6): org.jclouds.rest.AuthorizationException: (jclouds:pw[5d907853

Re: GCE query

2014-03-11 Thread Sathyasuriya Priya
hi Ignasi, Just an update and clarification on creating an example project for GCE. I started with the compute-basics example project. One important change needed was to change the dependency versions to 1.7.1 in pom. I see that compute.listImages(), compute.listNodes() are working fine. However,

Re: Where is the implementation for org.jclouds.openstack.nova.v2_0.features.ServerApi interface?

2014-03-11 Thread Ignasi Barrera
Thanks Jeffrey! I've added you as a collaborator to the project and assigned the issue to you. I. On 11 March 2014 06:43, Jeffrey Nguyen (jeffrngu) wrote: > FYI, I just created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-493 for > this enhancement. > > I'm currently working on this enhanceme

RE: [jclouds/abiquo issue] The vDC soft limits cannot be forced in version 2.6 of the API

2014-03-11 Thread Ignasi Barrera
Thanks for taking care or this, Carlos! Could you upload your changes to a branch in GitHub so I can have a look? If you can do that I'll upgrade the provider to properly use the 2.6 API (as AFAIK there are no other users using it with a 2.4 version) continuing your work. Thanks! I. El 11/03/201

RE: [jclouds/abiquo issue] The vDC soft limits cannot be forced in version 2.6 of the API

2014-03-11 Thread Carlos Garcia IbaƱez
Good morning everyone. I've implemented the changes suggested by Ignasi and I've built a patched version of the org.apache.jclouds.labs-abiquo artefact locally, in order to make use of the version 2.6 of the Abiquo API. Everything seems ok, but I'd like to know when (or if) the jClouds plugin wi