Re: Patches to master and 1.9.x?

2015-09-02 Thread Andrea Turli
+1 Even if not planned we may need to cut another fixing release from 1.9.x so backporting sounds sensible. Andrea On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 11:49 PM, Ignasi Barrera wrote: > Hi! > > I think we all have an agreement that we should release jclouds 2.0 as > soon as possible, and work together to ge

Patches to master and 1.9.x?

2015-09-02 Thread Ignasi Barrera
Hi! I think we all have an agreement that we should release jclouds 2.0 as soon as possible, and work together to get that done. Apart from the discussion of the feature set required to release 2.0, I think we should keep backporting fixes to 1.9.x. We'll be able to introduce breaking changes in

Re: [1.9.1] - CloudStack - userMetaData vs userData

2015-09-02 Thread Ignasi Barrera
You're right. We try to release a bugfix version every 6 weeks, but it is unlikely that we release another 1.9.x. We'd like to release jclouds 2.0 sooner than later and focus on it. Don't worry about the target branch. I'll take care of merging it to master. Thanks for the patches! On 1 September