Re: [VOTE] Release Apache jclouds 2.0.0 RC3

2016-11-10 Thread Andrew Gaul
+1, successfully ran verification script. Did not run integration tests but refer to positive RC2 results. On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 12:58:05AM +0100, Ignasi Barrera wrote: > Hello, > > This is the third release candidate for Apache jclouds 2.0.0. > > Please use the separate [DISCUSS] thread for

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache jclouds 2.0.0 RC2

2016-11-10 Thread Andrew Phillips
Hi Josef there were 6 other failures in the rest of Azure live tests in my environment. Do these also fail on RC3? I would assume so, given that the changes from RC2 to RC3 seem unlikely to affect this. But just wanted to double-check. Thanks for helping with the testing! ap

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache jclouds 2.0.0 RC3

2016-11-10 Thread Ignasi Barrera
+1 Run the verification scripts to check the following: * Checksums are valid * Signatures are valid * The expanded source archive builds and passes tests * All files have license headers where appropriate * Expanded source archives match the contents of the RC tags * All LICENSE and NOTICE files

Improvements to the Apache jclouds CI builds

2016-11-10 Thread Ignasi Barrera
Hi! This is just an informative email about some new builds we've added to our CI. Given the recurrent requests of supporting several Guava and Guice versions, we've created a build that allows everyone to keep track of the compatibility of jclouds with different Java versions, and different vers

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache jclouds 2.0.0 RC2

2016-11-10 Thread Josef Cacek
Hi, there were 6 other failures in the rest of Azure live tests in my environment. Some of them could be related to the JCLOUDS-1198 or to the fact I had to change the LOCATION in BaseAzureComputeApiLiveTest from "West Europe" to "East US". I'll investigate the issues as time allows. Tests run