Re: jclouds CI builds for 2.0.x

2016-11-15 Thread Andrew Gaul
On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 09:37:31AM -0500, Andrew Phillips wrote: > Is there a plan to remove the "jclouds-guava-guice-comat" and Java 8 > builds entirely? Also, would it make sense to consider adding > compatibility builds for Java 9? jclouds is not yet compatible with JDK 9: https://issues.apach

Re: jclouds CI builds for 2.0.x

2016-11-15 Thread Ignasi Barrera
I'd say both builds could be removed now :) Regarding Java 9 builds, it would be great, but I think java 9 is not yet available in CloudBees. On 15 November 2016 at 15:37, Andrew Phillips wrote: > I've just created the builds for the 2.0.x branch. They're running for the >> first time but you'l

Re: jclouds CI builds for 2.0.x

2016-11-15 Thread Andrew Phillips
I've just created the builds for the 2.0.x branch. They're running for the first time but you'll see some of them failing. As soon as the snapshots are published to the snapshots repo they will go back to green. Thanks for the heads-up, Ignasi! I've also disabled our "jclouds-guava-guice-coma

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache jclouds 2.0.0 RC3

2016-11-15 Thread Dancy, Chris
+1 From: Alex Heneveld Sent: Monday, November 14, 2016 8:02 PM To: dev@jclouds.apache.org Subject: Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache jclouds 2.0.0 RC3 Congrats and thanks! --A On 14/11/2016 17:02, Ignasi Barrera wrote: > The vote is now closed, and with

jclouds CI builds for 2.0.x

2016-11-15 Thread Ignasi Barrera
Hi! I've just created the builds for the 2.0.x branch. They're running for the first time but you'll see some of them failing. As soon as the snapshots are published to the snapshots repo they will go back to green. I've also disabled our "jclouds-guava-guice-comat" build and configured the more