Re: Design review for Async implementation

2017-05-04 Thread Andrew Gaul
You must consider the alternate OutputStream approach I repeatedly suggested. I am sorry you have trouble with your email but not responding to the likely maintainer of this code is an extraordinary situation that you should remedy. On Thu, May 04, 2017 at 07:02:29AM -, kishore kumar wrote: >

Re: Design review for Async implementation

2017-05-04 Thread Ignasi Barrera
Do you mean this mailing list or the GitHub pull requests? On May 4, 2017 10:04 AM, "kishore kumar" wrote: > Hi, > > What is the process for design review for implementing Async API in > jclouds. > > One more issue I replying to comments in the forum but they are not > visible. I don't know why.

Re: [DISCUSS] OpenStack support from over the fence

2017-05-04 Thread Ignasi Barrera
We've got help from Google, Microsoft and ProfitBricks to develop their providers, which is great. The Microsoft guys were very kind and helped a lot bootstrapping the ARM provider. If can share the contact we have if you could be interested in getting in touch. Thanks for the OpenStack env offeri

Re: [DISCUSS] OpenStack support from over the fence

2017-05-04 Thread anthony shaw
I have a OpenStack deployment running in GCP, Keystone 3 and nova 12 (2.1 API) If anyone wants to use it for dev and test please email me. I'm going to blow it away in a week so it's just a sandbox. Also, can I point you to our tests which have test fixtures for 90% of our supported clouds, rec

Design review for Async implementation

2017-05-04 Thread kishore kumar
Hi, What is the process for design review for implementing Async API in jclouds. One more issue I replying to comments in the forum but they are not visible. I don't know why. It happened a couple of times.