Re: [DISCUSS] OpenStack support from over the fence

2017-05-04 Thread Ignasi Barrera
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 3, 2017 5:37 pm > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] OpenStack support from over the fence > To: mailto:dev@jclouds.apache.org>> > > > Hi Anthony! > > We currently support Nova 2.0 and Keystone 2.0. We are tracking and > looking forward to implement the

Re: [DISCUSS] OpenStack support from over the fence

2017-05-04 Thread anthony shaw
ted clouds, recorded from production deployments. It may come in useful if you're struggling to find real APIs or accounts. Anthony Shaw From: anthony shaw Sent: Wednesday, May 3, 2017 6:13:57 PM To: dev@jclouds.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] OpenStack suppor

Re: [DISCUSS] OpenStack support from over the fence

2017-05-03 Thread anthony shaw
Re: [DISCUSS] OpenStack support from over the fence To: mailto:dev@jclouds.apache.org>> Hi Anthony! We currently support Nova 2.0 and Keystone 2.0. We are tracking and looking forward to implement the Keystone v3 API [1], since version 2 has been removed in the last releases of OpenStack an

Re: [DISCUSS] OpenStack support from over the fence

2017-05-03 Thread Ignasi Barrera
Hi Anthony! We currently support Nova 2.0 and Keystone 2.0. We are tracking and looking forward to implement the Keystone v3 API [1], since version 2 has been removed in the last releases of OpenStack and supporting it is becoming a blocker. I have some design ideas in mind to keep compatibility w

[DISCUSS] OpenStack support from over the fence

2017-05-03 Thread anthony shaw
Hi, It's Anthony from the Apache Libcloud project, I'm looking at our OpenStack support (in particular Nova), which is really out of date. We support 2.0, they are on version 13 https://docs.openstack.org/releasenotes/nova/mitaka.html# I don't understand whether 13 means Keystone 3 and Nova 2.2,