An interesting thing regarding something like a common scale set API, would
it be a separate API or more like a parameter in “builder” — for instance
if creating more than one VM?
I’m planning on looking at the Rackspace implementation of this and help
Julio flesh things out.
-jim
On September
Andrea -
Just to clarify re: azure-arm — promotion from jclouds-labs to jclouds as a
non-labs provider? That would be excellent and I’m willing to contribute
the time to make sure that happens. As in another thread - there is some
new work going on, but it’s new features. I corrected some issue
at provider!
>
> Thanks,
> Andrea
>
> On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 10:55 AM, Ignasi Barrera wrote:
>
> > Regarding the promotion of the ARM provider (I'd pretty much like that
> > to happen too), should we fix first any of the open issues?
> > https://s.apache.o
at 1:55:31 AM, Ignasi Barrera (n...@apache.org) wrote:
Regarding the promotion of the ARM provider (I'd pretty much like that
to happen too), should we fix first any of the open issues?
https://s.apache.org/76Fq
On 5 September 2017 at 09:49, Jim Spring wrote:
> Andrea -
>
> Just
included as part of this promotion? If he can’t finish
the PR this week, it might be a couple of weeks out.
Thoughts?
Thanks
-jim spring
On September 6, 2017 at 8:49:08 AM, Jim Spring (jmspr...@gmail.com) wrote:
Ignasi -
A couple of the open issues listed are being worked on. I will know a bit
pass.
>
> We also have a large number of issues with assignees that are not likely
> active:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/JCLOUDS/summary/statistics
>
> We should unassign these to avoid licking the cookie and discouraging
> other contributors.
>
> On Mon
Andrea, Ignasi -
I’ve managed to figure out the authentication issue Andrea was running into
with his KeyVault implementation keeping the live tests from working. I
don’t think a PR is needed, but I am cleaning up the code to just double
check.
Basically, the issue is as follows:
1. KeyVault r
Andrea -
A PR is present plumbing in the ObjectID. I’ll be looking at fleshing out
the tests more today.
-jim
On October 16, 2017 at 9:48:39 AM, Jim Spring (jmspr...@gmail.com) wrote:
Andrea, Ignasi -
I’ve managed to figure out the authentication issue Andrea was running into
with his
s a required parameter (as it is now). I
> don't see an immediate need to auto-discover it or to have it
> configured per-context in advance, so I'd say a property just for the
> tests is fine.
>
>
> I.
>
> On 16 October 2017 at 20:44, Jim Spring wrote:
> >
tomorrow morning pacific time.
-j
Sent from my iThingy
> On Oct 17, 2017, at 15:39, Jim Spring wrote:
>
> Andrea -
>
> Take a look at the PR I did against your feature/vault-api branch. I’m
> extending the tests now.
>
> I’ll do a PR once I get all the key tests
Azure KeyVault APIs work in such a manner that they will return a valid
result, yet the operation may actually take time to complete. The only way
to verify is to perform an operation one expects to succeed and retry if it
fails (it seems).
For instance:
1. Create KeyVault
2. Update KeyVault t
recently but I hope to start having more time,
> so feel free to ping me whenever you find me there.
>
> >
> > -j
> >
> > Sent from my iThingy
> >
> >> On Oct 17, 2017, at 15:39, Jim Spring wrote:
> >>
> >> Andrea -
> >
hem.
WRT (3), agree. Let's first clarify the usage patterns and expected
workflow when using the API and then let's discuss how can we
translate that into jclouds APIs.
Thanks for taking care of this!
I.
On 26 October 2017 at 05:10, Jim Spring wrote:
> @Ignasi, @Andrea -
>
>
functionality to create the storage accounts
dynamically. (Is there any planned ETA for the storage account APIs to
the new ARM version?).
Don't worry about huge PRs :) Happy to review!
On 29 October 2017 at 04:01, Jim Spring wrote:
> An update —
>
> I’ll probably finish mock tests tomorrow an
@Ignasi/@Andrea -
I'm guilty for writing the code as it is in OAuth, I should have thought ahead.
Azure KeyVault has a dynamic resource (the vault URI) that
authorization must be requested against. In the current PR, @Andrea
added the KeyVaultFilter to support this, mostly duplicating
ClientCred
I've seen a mix of azurecompute-arm failures (sorry, I'll enumerate
tomorrow), but nothing to hold up the release.
Small things like password requirements changing.
-jim
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 5:52 PM, Andrew Phillips wrote:
>> However, I am unclear on why the test fails since the filesystem b
gt; curious about the failures you've seen.
> Many thanks for taking the time and helping with the release validation!
>
> @demobox, +1 to file an issue to properly track this. Do you know if with
> our current plan we could have some Windows build in CloudBees?
>
>
>
>
&
+1
Sent from my iThingy
> On Jan 16, 2018, at 11:18, Andrew Gaul wrote:
>
> +1, this release will also resolve Guava issues for many users.
>
>> On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 03:27:13PM +0100, Ignasi Barrera wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> I'd like to release jclouds 2.1.0. There have been major additions in
>
To my knowledge, the ARM provider has not been tested against Azure China.
For the subset of features, outside of available VM SKUs, there isn’t
anything glaring that I see that would keep The ARM provider from working.
I’ll see if I can get access to run a quick test, but I’m not sure if I can
ge
until one tries.
-j
On May 23, 2018 at 11:23:27 AM, Duncan Johnston-Watt (
dun...@blockchaintp.com) wrote:
Jim
Thanks. That was my working assumption. If you can test it that would be
much appreciated.
Best
Duncan
On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 6:55 PM, Jim Spring wrote:
> To my knowledge, the
you can test it that would be
much appreciated.
Best
Duncan
On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 6:55 PM, Jim Spring wrote:
> To my knowledge, the ARM provider has not been tested against Azure
> China. For the subset of features, outside of available VM SKUs, there
> isn’t anything glaring t
If it will help, I’ll run through the bulk of Azure tests tomorrow with
multiple regions to sanity check.
Sent from my iThingy
> On Aug 13, 2018, at 18:18, Daniel Estevez wrote:
>
> +1
>
> Ran the verification scripts
> Also executed the live tests for DigitalOceanV2
> Tests run: 67, Failures
Integrating with provisioning would make sense. In general, the apis
exposed by the cloud providers are fairly stable for this.
Doing any sort of duplication of kubectl, yaml file manipulation, or k8s
apis would be an honorous process especially with APIs changes each release.
-j
On Wed, Apr 2
I’ve been busy on other projects, but the Java ones are moving towards 11 over
8 due to EoL issues.
Sent from my iThingy
> On May 2, 2020, at 20:52, Andrew Gaul wrote:
>
> On Sat, May 02, 2020 at 12:49:16PM -0400, Andrew Phillips wrote:
>>> Some ideas:
>>>
>>> * spin out components, similar
+1
I need to get back into being active myself.
On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 4:45 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofre
wrote:
> +1
>
> Andrew will be a great chair for sure !
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> > Le 11 janv. 2021 à 13:02, Ignasi Barrera a écrit :
> >
> > Hi!
> >
> > It's been a while since my availability and
Patrick -
I think the PR would be a great addition. I can help you along in the process.
-Jim
Sent from my iPhone
> On Apr 18, 2021, at 11:56 AM, Patrick von Steht wrote:
>
> Hi,
> as far as I see, jclouds only support SharedKeyLite authorization for Azure
> Blobstorage.
>
> Would you w
The azure storage proposal never saw traction. I was unable to dig up AD
options. I have some pending questions I haven't gotten answers to.
-j
On Wed, Aug 18, 2021, 6:58 PM Andrew Phillips wrote:
> > It has been 5 months since jclouds 2.3.0 and I would like to plan to
> release 2.4.0 next mo
Agreed, if any show stoppers, I can carve out time to help.
On Sat, Mar 9, 2024 at 10:58 PM Andrew Gaul wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 10:03:07PM +0900, Andrew Gaul wrote:
> > jclouds development has slowed from 123 commits from 26 contributors in
> > 2018 to just 24 from 6 contributors in 202
John -
I think the primary issue with backward compatibility/a java8 branch is that
there are not really any active iCloud’s committers at the moment.
-jim
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jul 15, 2024, at 09:25, John Calcote wrote:
>
> Hi Andrew,
>
> I recently submitted a PR to support virtual p
Will have eyes in the morning ..
Sent from my iPhone
> On Feb 1, 2025, at 22:54, Andrew Gaul wrote:
>
> Relevant GitHub issue:
> https://github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-for-java/issues/42603
>
>> On Sat, Feb 01, 2025 at 10:46:33PM -0800, Jim Spring wrote:
>> Let’s
Let’s connect tomorrow (Sunday or early pst Monday), I might need this.
Sent from my iPad
> On Feb 1, 2025, at 9:36 PM, Andrew Gaul wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 07, 2024 at 11:46:50AM -0700, Andrew Gaul wrote:
>> I am preparing S3Proxy for a post-jclouds attic future and implemented a
>> provider us
31 matches
Mail list logo
