Re: ARQ eliminates duplicates during unionDefaultGraph?

2012-06-20 Thread Andy Seaborne
On 19/06/12 14:32, Simon Helsen wrote: Hi guys, I recently ran into a query which produced a surprising result and it is not clear to me if I don't understand the spec correctly or whether it is an ARQ bug. The scenario is that you have a quad store with e.g. 2 identical triples, except that

[jira] [Assigned] (JENA-263) Adding resource property inside TDB transaction causes message '******* UNEXPECTED'

2012-06-20 Thread Andy Seaborne (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-263?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Andy Seaborne reassigned JENA-263: -- Assignee: Andy Seaborne Adding resource property inside TDB transaction causes message

[jira] [Resolved] (JENA-263) Adding resource property inside TDB transaction causes message '******* UNEXPECTED'

2012-06-20 Thread Andy Seaborne (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-263?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Andy Seaborne resolved JENA-263. Resolution: Not A Problem The problem is that you are getting the model reference outside the first

[jira] [Closed] (JENA-263) Adding resource property inside TDB transaction causes message '******* UNEXPECTED'

2012-06-20 Thread Andy Seaborne (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-263?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Andy Seaborne closed JENA-263. -- Adding resource property inside TDB transaction causes message '*** UNEXPECTED'

[jira] [Commented] (JENA-261) QueryIterService returns an empty solution on exception

2012-06-20 Thread Andy Seaborne (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-261?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13397329#comment-13397329 ] Andy Seaborne commented on JENA-261: Reported to SPARQL-WG:

Re: [jira] [Closed] (JENA-263) Adding resource property inside TDB transaction causes message '******* UNEXPECTED'

2012-06-20 Thread Ian Dickinson
Thanks Andy. By re-ordering actions and the transactions in my code, I've resolved the root problem. I know you said you're hoping to remove this restriction on models and transactions at some point via view graphs, but in the meantime would it be worth adding more diagnostic info to the **

Semantic Web track at ApacheCon (Fwd: Tracks for ApacheCon Europe - Project Proposals needed)

2012-06-20 Thread Reto Bachmann-Gmür
What about a semantic web track at ApacheCon? Cheers, Reto -- Forwarded message -- From: Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.com Date: Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 10:22 PM Subject: Fwd: Tracks for ApacheCon Europe - Project Proposals needed To: ooo-priv...@incubator.apache.org,

Re: Semantic Web track at ApacheCon (Fwd: Tracks for ApacheCon Europe - Project Proposals needed)

2012-06-20 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Reto Bachmann-Gmür r...@apache.org wrote: What about a semantic web track at ApacheCon? I like the idea, and would like it even better if it was called linked data, web of data of anything that does not include the word semantic. -Bertrand (with my marketing

Re: Semantic Web track at ApacheCon (Fwd: Tracks for ApacheCon Europe - Project Proposals needed)

2012-06-20 Thread Marco Neumann
just semantics Bertrand ... On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 5:31 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org wrote: On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Reto Bachmann-Gmür r...@apache.org wrote: What about a semantic web track at ApacheCon? I like the idea, and would like it even better if it was

Re: Semantic Web track at ApacheCon (Fwd: Tracks for ApacheCon Europe - Project Proposals needed)

2012-06-20 Thread Marco Neumann
But I like the idea and happy to participate the effort. On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 5:15 AM, Reto Bachmann-Gmür r...@apache.org wrote: What about a semantic web track at ApacheCon? Cheers, Reto -- Forwarded message -- From: Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.com Date: Tue,

Re: Semantic Web track at ApacheCon (Fwd: Tracks for ApacheCon Europe - Project Proposals needed)

2012-06-20 Thread Tommaso Teofili
2012/6/20 Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Reto Bachmann-Gmür r...@apache.org wrote: What about a semantic web track at ApacheCon? +1, it sounds very good Reto. I like the idea, and would like it even better if it was called linked data, web

Re: Semantic Web track at ApacheCon (Fwd: Tracks for ApacheCon Europe - Project Proposals needed)

2012-06-20 Thread Nick Kew
On 20 Jun 2012, at 10:31, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Reto Bachmann-Gmür r...@apache.org wrote: What about a semantic web track at ApacheCon? I like the idea, and would like it even better if it was called linked data, web of data of anything that does not

Re: Semantic Web track at ApacheCon (Fwd: Tracks for ApacheCon Europe - Project Proposals needed)

2012-06-20 Thread Ross Gardler
Note that in this mail you forwarded mails from a private list to a public list. You need to be more careful. No damage done - the only reason this is private is that it's a PR related activity and thus pre-announcement is bad. The open discussion you are kick-starting should certainly be

Re: Semantic Web track at ApacheCon (Fwd: Tracks for ApacheCon Europe - Project Proposals needed)

2012-06-20 Thread Reto Bachmann-Gmür
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 11:31 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org wrote: On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Reto Bachmann-Gmür r...@apache.org wrote: What about a semantic web track at ApacheCon? I like the idea, and would like it even better if it was called linked data, web of

Re: [jira] [Closed] (JENA-263) Adding resource property inside TDB transaction causes message '******* UNEXPECTED'

2012-06-20 Thread Andy Seaborne
On 20/06/12 09:23, Ian Dickinson wrote: Thanks Andy. By re-ordering actions and the transactions in my code, I've resolved the root problem. I know you said you're hoping to remove this restriction on models and transactions at some point via view graphs, but in the meantime would it be worth

[jira] [Commented] (JENA-265) BINDINGS being parsed as BIND, leading to unexpected … error

2012-06-20 Thread Andy Seaborne (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-265?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13397542#comment-13397542 ] Andy Seaborne commented on JENA-265: Sorry - the SPARQL implementation is ahead of the

[jira] [Resolved] (JENA-265) BINDINGS being parsed as BIND, leading to unexpected … error

2012-06-20 Thread Andy Seaborne (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-265?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Andy Seaborne resolved JENA-265. Resolution: Not A Problem BINDINGS being parsed as BIND, leading to unexpected … error

[jira] [Commented] (JENA-264) Fuseki SPARQL endpoint doesn't understand Content-type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded; charset=utf-8

2012-06-20 Thread Andy Seaborne (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-264?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13397552#comment-13397552 ] Andy Seaborne commented on JENA-264: Which version is this? fuseki-server --mem

[jira] [Commented] (JENA-265) BINDINGS being parsed as BIND, leading to unexpected … error

2012-06-20 Thread Andy Seaborne (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-265?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13397554#comment-13397554 ] Andy Seaborne commented on JENA-265: PS sparql.org is now up-to-date so you can test the

[jira] [Commented] (JENA-260) TDB Transactional error logged by Fuseki server for all update operations

2012-06-20 Thread Alex Hall (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-260?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13397639#comment-13397639 ] Alex Hall commented on JENA-260: Everything appears to be working fine with the latest

[jira] [Commented] (JENA-260) TDB Transactional error logged by Fuseki server for all update operations

2012-06-20 Thread Andy Seaborne (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-260?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13397701#comment-13397701 ] Andy Seaborne commented on JENA-260: Thanks for the report. TDB

[jira] [Resolved] (JENA-260) TDB Transactional error logged by Fuseki server for all update operations

2012-06-20 Thread Andy Seaborne (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-260?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Andy Seaborne resolved JENA-260. Resolution: Fixed Assignee: Andy Seaborne TDB Transactional error logged by Fuseki server

Re: Performance/optimization of minus queries

2012-06-20 Thread Rob Vesse
Hey Paul Unfortunately the list strips attachments (sorry - apache thing, not under our control) Would you mind opening a JIRA for this and attach the patch there? Please remember to check the box that says you agree to license it to the ASF Cheers, Rob On 6/20/12 5:05 PM, Paul Gearon

[jira] [Created] (JENA-266) MINUS operations too slow

2012-06-20 Thread Paul Gearon (JIRA)
Paul Gearon created JENA-266: Summary: MINUS operations too slow Key: JENA-266 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-266 Project: Apache Jena Issue Type: Improvement

[jira] [Updated] (JENA-266) MINUS operations too slow

2012-06-20 Thread Paul Gearon (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-266?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Paul Gearon updated JENA-266: - Attachment: arq.patch Patch against jena-arq MINUS operations too slow