Re: [Contribution] Portuguese Translation of Tutorials

2013-02-05 Thread Guilherme Jose Carvalho Cavalcanti
Just to say. Everything is "ok". You can publish when you can! Very Thanks and Very Happy to contribute! 2013/1/19 Guilherme Jose Carvalho Cavalcanti > I checked e fixed some mistakes. Till now, everything is OK for both > tutorials that I submitted. > > I'm waiting for the other two tutorial

[jira] [Commented] (JENA-164) LARQ needs to update the Lucene index when a SPARQL Update request is received

2013-02-05 Thread Elli Schwarz (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-164?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13571770#comment-13571770 ] Elli Schwarz commented on JENA-164: --- Is any further work planned on this issue? I use Fuse

Re: Streaming SPARQL Updates

2013-02-05 Thread Stephen Allen
So UpdateAction, UpdateExecutionFactory, UpdateProcessor, UpdateProcessorStreaming are part of the user API and should not have changed much. They are the way to interact with the update system. For storage engine implementers, what has changed is that UpdateEngine is now stream based. If, as a s

Re: svn commit: r1442540 - in /jena/trunk/jena-arq/src/main/java/org/apache/jena/riot/system: FastAbbreviatingPrefixMap.java PrefixMapBase.java PrefixMapStd.java

2013-02-05 Thread Rob Vesse
Thanks for doing the refactor, I never did find time for that last week Rob On 2/5/13 11:14 AM, "a...@apache.org" wrote: >Author: andy >Date: Tue Feb 5 11:14:13 2013 >New Revision: 1442540 > >URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1442540&view=rev >Log: >Prepare for overridable local name rul

Re: Streaming SPARQL Updates

2013-02-05 Thread Rob Vesse
Actually part of my email was still valid, UpdateAction.execute() would not have fallen back to non-streaming, should now do this as of my latest commit Rob On 2/5/13 9:19 AM, "Rob Vesse" wrote: >Ignore my last email, having problems with Eclipse auto-complete and >workspace versioning sync is

Re: Streaming SPARQL Updates

2013-02-05 Thread Rob Vesse
Ignore my last email, having problems with Eclipse auto-complete and workspace versioning sync issues, also my jet lagged brain having flown back into the US only yesterday ;) Garghhh Rob On 2/5/13 9:16 AM, "Rob Vesse" wrote: >Ok I am slightly stumped by the latest changes > >UpdateAction.exe

Re: Streaming SPARQL Updates

2013-02-05 Thread Rob Vesse
Ok I am slightly stumped by the latest changes UpdateAction.execute() is broken in that it only tries to do streaming updates and can't fall back to non-streaming. UpdateProcessor no longer has any execute() method so is the assumption simply that the update happens when startRequest() is called

Re: approver process?

2013-02-05 Thread Rob Vesse
I don't think we have a document on that anywhere, I assume here you are talking about open/unassigned JIRAs possibly with patch(es) attached? Generally speaking if it's unassigned on JIRA feel free to take it and start looking at it, if someone is assigned but there's no apparent activity you can

Re: Streaming SPARQL Updates

2013-02-05 Thread Andy Seaborne
I have unified the two update paths into a single path. I also removed the ability to pass in an UpdateRequest into the UpdateEngineFactory. In fact, I've eliminated all the places you could pass one in. Since with the streaming capability, we won't be able to have one. This required one chang

Re: Streaming SPARQL Updates

2013-02-05 Thread Andy Seaborne
On 01/02/13 21:06, Stephen Allen wrote: Replying to both Andy and Rob in this email, comments inline. ... Initial binding looks like a mistake because an update is multiple operations and historical at best. Remove this (via a deprecation cycle?). Use BIND or VALUES nowadays. Agreed. Initi